UN to no longer monitor situation in
J and K through its military observer group
Wednesday, August 03, 2016
In an unusual move, the UN has backtracked from its statement that it will continue to monitor the situation in Kashmir through its military observer group in India and Pakistan, clarifying that the mission does not have a mandate beyond the LoC.
In an unusual move, the UN has backtracked from its statement that it will continue to monitor the situation in Kashmir through its military observer group in India and Pakistan, clarifying that the mission does not have a mandate beyond the LoC.
The clarification was issued by UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon’s
spokesman Stephane Dujarric on August 2, a day after the UN chief’s deputy
spokesperson Farhan Haq told reporters that the the UN will continue to monitor
the situation in Kashmir, including through “our monitoring group” UN Military
Observer Group in India and Pakistan (UNMOGIP).
Dujarric said regarding the situation in Kashmir, “I just wanted to clarify something, which is that UNMOGIP, the UN observer presence there, its mandate is to report on the ceasefire between India and Pakistan along the Line of Control. The UN Mission there does not have a mandate there beyond the Line of Control.”
Dujarric said regarding the situation in Kashmir, “I just wanted to clarify something, which is that UNMOGIP, the UN observer presence there, its mandate is to report on the ceasefire between India and Pakistan along the Line of Control. The UN Mission there does not have a mandate there beyond the Line of Control.”
When asked why he was making the clarification, Dujarric said, “because
I think it needed to be said”.
The clarification seems to imply that the situation and incidents in
Kashmir are India’s internal matter and do not come under the control of
UNMOGIP that only observes and reports on ceasefire violations along the Line
of Control and does not monitor the situation in Jammu and Kashmir.
Dujarric was also asked why the Secretary General does not initiate efforts to settle the Kashmir conflict, even as the world body is trying to resolve conflicts in Cyprus and the Middle East.
Dujarric was also asked why the Secretary General does not initiate efforts to settle the Kashmir conflict, even as the world body is trying to resolve conflicts in Cyprus and the Middle East.
“I will leave it to you and others to…to analyse the reasoning. I think
the questions on the situation in Kashmir have come up with us today and
previously. Our answers to those questions remain the same,” Dujarric said,
without elaborating.
Asked why there is “reluctance” on the part of the Secretary-General and
the UN to offer any comments on the situation in Kashmir, Dujarric said when
questions arise on the issue, the UN offers comments.
“So I don’t agree as being reluctant,” he said.
“So I don’t agree as being reluctant,” he said.
Protests broke out across Kashmir Valley on July 9, a day after Hizbul
Mujahideen commander Burhan Wani was killed in an encounter with Indian
security forces, leading to clashes in which 50 people have been killed and
over 5,600 injured.
According to the Security Council mandate given in resolution 307 of
1971, UNMOGIP observes and reports on ceasefire violations along and across the
Line of Control and the working boundary between the nuclear-armed South Asian
neighbours in Jammu and Kashmir, as well as reports developments that could
lead to ceasefire violations.
India has maintained that UNMOGIP has outlived its utility and is irrelevant after the Simla Agreement and the consequent establishment of the Line of Control (LoC). India has always stated that it has “no role to play whatsoever”.
India has maintained that UNMOGIP has outlived its utility and is irrelevant after the Simla Agreement and the consequent establishment of the Line of Control (LoC). India has always stated that it has “no role to play whatsoever”.
As of March 31 this year, UNMOGIP has 44 military observers, 25
international civilian personnel and 47 local civilian staff.
No comments:
Post a Comment