Monday, 24 March 2025

A quote from my book on the China Pakistan Economic Corridor:

 A quote from my book on the China Pakistan Economic Corridor:

If everything is in black and white, and there is no hidden agenda or clandestine aspect of the CPEC, then why on earth both China and Pakistan are hiding details? Each time they share some details their contradictions become more apparent, and it adds to the suspicions of the critics. Is it not the responsibility of the N League government and those who manage this mega project to ensure everything is transparent and that all Provinces and people belonging to all sections of Pakistani society are on board and feel part of it?

 Moreover, is it not essential that people of occupied Gilgit Baltistan, Occupied Jammu and Kashmir and rebels of Balochistan are taken into confidence. Or is it that the government is determined to crush all the rebels, and silence all the critics because the CPEC has attained a status of a holy cow? Perhaps the authorities have taken this position that any criticism and opposition, no matter how valid, is tantamount to an attack on national security and must be treated as treason.

This attitude and narrative will have very serious consequences for Pakistan. I believe they still have time to rectify the problems and take all the stakeholders into confidence. If, on the other hand, the rulers and secret agencies continue to exhibit obstinacy, intolerance, and lack of care and vision, then sadly, it will be regarded as a China-Punjab Economic Corridor with extremely serious consequences for the CPEC and the future of Pakistan.

Is CPEC Economic Corridor or a Strategic Game Plan?

Dr Shabir Choudhry

CPEC is China's plan for Pakistan - where is Pakistan's plan for Pakistan?

Published on 30 May 2017


Thursday, 13 March 2025

How dare you? Bad guys have big tongues.

 How dare you? Bad guys have big tongues.

 

1/ Nawaz Sharif was becoming too big to manage, so they arranged infamous dharnas of cousin brothers.

 

2/ When Prince Charming got fed up of speaking to empty chairs, they arranged APC incident to give him a face-saving that he called off the dharna.

 

3/ Nawaz Sharif wanted to punish Musharaf for overthrowing an elected government. They said how dare you touch our chief. APC incident had many targets, and the National Action Plan was ‘passed’ to punish bloody civilians and tell them once again who is boss in Pakistan.

 

4/ It is estimated that hundreds of bloody civilians were sent to the gallows to give a message to the civilians, don’t even think about it again.

 

5/As if that was not enough, they had to ‘buy’ and intimidate many ‘judges’ and civil servants to punish Nawaz Sharif so that no Prime Minister in future even think of punishing the holy cows.

 

6/ And now, the Jaffar Express incident. Some bad guys were telling me that, like the incident of APC, this incident also has many targets, and to hit all those targets, National Action Plan 2 is coming. Also, the 27th Amendment will soon be presented. Who dares to challenge this?

 

7/ Don’t believe what bad guys say. Just follow those who you have been following since 1947. Sadly, the problem is, that Pakistan is facing enormous challenges this time around, and only Allah can save Pakistan.

Wednesday, 12 March 2025

Written statement submitted by Jamil Maqsood President of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the UKPNP, in the 58th Session of the Human Rights Council under agenda item 8.

 Written statement submitted by Jamil Maqsood President of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the UKPNP, in the 58th Session of the Human Rights Council under agenda item 8.

 

Subject: The Vienna Declaration and Program of Action and

the State of Human Rights in Jammu & Kashmir, Azad

Jammu & Kashmir, and Gilgit-Baltistan.

 

The Vienna Declaration and Program of Action (VDPA), guarantees core principles, including self-determination, equality before the law, and the right to live in dignity. These values, reflected in Article 1 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), state that all peoples have the right to freely determine their political status and

pursue economic, social, and cultural development.

 

However, the people of erstwhile State of Jammu & Kashmir, particularly those in Azad Jammu & Kashmir (AJK) and Gilgit-Baltistan continue to suffer systematic human rights violations and the denial of fundamental freedoms. The United Nations should act to address these issues and ensure that the rights of these populations are upheld.

 

Jammu & Kashmir is of great strategic, cultural, and historical importance. The region has been at the heart of a territorial dispute between India, Pakistan, and China for over seventy years. The region is divided into Indian-administered Jammu & Kashmir and Pakistan- Administered Azad Jammu & Kashmir (AJK) and Gilgit-Baltistan. Despite the differing administrative structures, human rights violations persist throughout the entire region, particularly in AJK and Gilgit-Baltistan, where the people continue to face political subjugation and the denial of their basic freedoms.

Azad Jammu & Kashmir (AJK) is often portrayed by Pakistan as an autonomous region.

 

However, in reality, the region remains under significant influence from the central government, particularly through military involvement in its political and administrative affairs. AJK is not an independent entity but is effectively controlled by Pakistan, which undermines its autonomy.

 

Although the people of Azad Jammu & Kashmir (AJK) are identify as Pakistani citizens by Islamabad, they are denied meaningful political representation. Notably, they are excluded from Pakistan’s National Assembly, which violates Article 25 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), guaranteeing equality before the law and protection from discrimination. This denial of political representation perpetuates disenfranchisement and marginalization of the people of AJK.

 

Furthermore, the Vienna Declaration (Paragraph 2) underscores self-determination as a fundamental human right. Yet, the people of AJK continue to be deprived of the freedom to determine their political future. Despite Pakistan’s claims of autonomy for the region, no clear path to independence or full autonomy exists. The absence of a transparent and fair process, such as a referendum, to allow the people of AJK to express their political aspirations undermines their right to self-determination, as guaranteed in Article 1 of the ICCPR. By denying them the opportunity to decide their political future, Pakistan is violating their fundamental human rights.

 

This lack of political freedom is further compounded by a repressive environment where those advocating for greater autonomy, self-determination, or independence face arbitrary detention, harassment, and even violence. The government’s crackdown on political dissent violates Article 19 of the ICCPR, which guarantees the right to hold opinions without

interference and to seek, receive, and impart information through any medium. These restrictions stifle political discourse and suppress peaceful opposition, further entrenching the political marginalization of the people of Pakistani-administered Azad Jammu & Kashmir.

 

The situation in Gilgit-Baltistan is even more severe than in Azad Jammu & Kashmir (AJK). Despite its strategic importance, particularly in relation to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), the people of Gilgit-Baltistan have been systematically denied their right to self-determination. The region is governed by executive orders, and there are no democratic structures to ensure meaningful local representation. Consequently, the people of Gilgit-Baltistan remain excluded from Pakistan’s political processes, with no voice in decisions affecting their lives. This exclusion violates Article 1 of the ICCPR, which affirms the right of peoples to determine their political status and pursue economic, social, and

cultural development.

 

The absence of political representation and self-determination in Gilgit-Baltistan constitutes an ongoing violation of international law. The Vienna Declaration (Paragraph 1) emphasizes that all peoples should have the right to freely determine their political future. By denying the people of Gilgit-Baltistan this right and continuing to govern the region through executive

decrees, Pakistan is contravening their rights under the ICCPR.

 

Furthermore, the suppression of political expression and the targeting of activists in Gilgit- Baltistan reflect a situation similar to that in AJK. Political leaders and activists advocating for greater autonomy or independence face arbitrary detention, threats, and violence. This repression violates the right to peaceful assembly, as guaranteed by Article 21 of the ICCPR.

 

The absence of political freedoms in Gilgit-Baltistan stifles the development of a democratic society and entrenches political oppression in the region. In both Azad Jammu & Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan, the military’s presence in civilian life has resulted in widespread human rights violations. The military often uses excessive force against peaceful protesters, leading to extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances, arbitrary detention, and torture. These actions violate Article 6 of the ICCPR, which protects the right to life, and Article 7, which prohibits torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment. The heavy-handed response to peaceful dissent in both regions clearly breaches international human rights standards.

 

In Gilgit-Baltistan, the situation is particularly alarming for the Shia Muslim community, which faces systematic discrimination, sectarian violence, and religious intolerance. Extremist groups, allegedly linked to Pakistan's military establishment, have targeted the Shia population with violence and terror. These attacks violate Article 27 of the ICCPR, which guarantees the rights of minorities to enjoy their culture, practice their religion, and speak

their language. The failure of Pakistani authorities to protect the Shia community and ensure justice for victims is a serious breach of the fundamental rights of religious minorities.

 

Another critical issue affecting both regions is economic exploitation. Both territories possess vast natural resources, but these resources are often extracted for the benefit of external actors, with little or no benefit to local populations. In Gilgit-Baltistan, the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) has exacerbated this exploitation, leaving local communities marginalized and underdeveloped. The extraction n of natural resources in both regions violates Article 1 of the ICCPR, which guarantees the right of peoples to freely dispose of their natural resources in accordance with their development needs. This exploitation perpetuates poverty, worsening the already precarious human rights situation in both regions.

 

The United Nations must take urgent steps to enforce its resolutions on Jammu & Kashmir, which have long called for a free and fair referendum to allow the people of these regions to determine their political future, in accordance with Article 1 of the ICCPR. Diplomatic efforts must focus on ensuring that the fundamental rights and freedoms of the people of AJK and Gilgit-Baltistan are safeguarded, including the right to self-determination, the protection of political freedoms, and the safeguarding of civil liberties.

 

The failure of the international community to address these ongoing violations represents a significant breach of the commitments made in the Vienna Declaration and the ICCPR. The continued denial of self-determination, political freedoms, and fundamental human rights to the people of Azad Jammu & Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan cannot be justified. Immediate and robust action is required to hold accountable those responsible for these violations.

 

The Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, the following international conventions and frameworks are crucial for the protection of the rights of the people of Jammu & Kashmir in general and particularly for the people of Azad Jammu & Kashmir and Gilgit.

 

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT) Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD) Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) Convention on the Rights of the

Child (CRC) International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families (ICMW) Declaration on the Right to Development.

 

The people of Jammu & Kashmir (including Azad Jammu & Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan) are entitled to live in peace, dignity, and freedom. They deserve their fundamental rights, including the right to self-determination, political freedoms, and the right to live without fear of persecution. The UN should take immediate action to address the ongoing human rights violations in these regions, ensuring that the voices of the people are heard and respected.

 

CDP urges the United Nations to take note of these violations and hold both India and Pakistan accountable for safeguarding the rights of the people and fulfilling their international obligations. The UN must demand that both nations take immediate steps to protect the fundamental freedoms of the people in Jammu & Kashmir, Azad Jammu & Kashmir, and Gilgit-Baltistan, thereby upholding the principles of justice and human dignity.

 

Jamil Maqsood Additional Representative

Monday, 3 March 2025

Imran Khan Writes From Prison-Why the World Must Pay Attention To Pakistan. Imran Khan.

 Imran Khan Writes From Prison-Why the World Must Pay Attention To Pakistan. Imran Khan.

By Imran Khan   February 28, 2025

 

Imran Khan is the founder of the political party Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf and served as the 19th prime minister of Pakistan from August 2018 until April 2022. In jail since 2023, he has been facing several court cases charging him with offenses ranging from corruption to misuse of power. He denies the accusations.

As we settle into 2025, I reflect on what has been one of the most tumultuous and testing periods in Pakistan’s history. From my confinement in a solitary cell, I witness the heartbreaking reality of a nation gripped by authoritarian rule. Yet, despite everything, I remain steadfast in my belief in the resilience of the Pakistani people and their unwavering commitment to justice.

 

The politically motivated charges against me are nothing more than an attempt to silence my fight for democracy. But this struggle is not about me alone. The erosion of democracy in Pakistan has far-reaching consequences. A destabilized Pakistan threatens regional security, disrupts trade, and weakens global democratic values. The world must recognize the urgency of this crisis—not just for Pakistan’s future, but for the stability of South Asia and beyond. 

 

The suppression of democratic voices in a country as pivotal to regional and indeed global security as Pakistan sets a dangerous precedent, one that should concern all who believe in free and fair governance.

Read More: Imran Khan on His Plan to Return to Power

 

This past year has brought unprecedented oppression. The brutal crackdown on my political party, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), and its supporters has shocked the world. International rights groups and the U.N. have documented arbitrary detentions, and politically driven trials in military courts. To date, 103 PTI workers and office bearers have been convicted in these courts—a blatant violation of Pakistan’s commitments under international human rights conventions, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights or ICCPR. The international community, including the EU, U.K., and U.S., has voiced concerns over these trials.

 

These issues affect ordinary Pakistanis. Pakistan risks losing its preferential trade status with the EU, a move that would devastate our economy, particularly the textile sector. Yet, those in power in Pakistan continue down their  reckless path, jeopardising Pakistan’s standing with fabricated narratives and baseless propaganda about me and my fellow PTI party workers. 

 

The world must also pay attention because, as democracy is eroded internally in Pakistan, terrorism has surged in regions such as Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan. This has not happened by accident, nor is it simply chance. 

 

Rather than addressing these critical security threats, the Pakistani military’s resources have been diverted to a campaign of vengeance against political opponents such as PTI. The judiciary, instead of being a bulwark for justice, has been reduced to what I view as a tool of political persecution. Anti-terrorism courts are now filled with PTI supporters facing absurd charges.

 

Homes have been raided, families have been terrorised, and even women and children have not been spared from this brutal repression. Our social media volunteers, supporters in the diaspora, and activists have had their families harassed and abducted, all in an effort to silence dissent. My party has documented 12 supporters killed by security services during anti-government protests in Islamabad in late November.

 

Despite my concerns about the country’s leadership,  including about the allegations of fraud in the election that brought it to power, I authorised PTI’s leadership to engage in talks with the current government to prevent further violence and human rights abuses. 

 

Our agenda was clear: a judicial commission to investigate attacks on PTI party workers and unarmed protesters. We also demanded the release of all political prisoners. 

 

In response, I was offered house arrest in exchange for ambiguous “political space” for PTI, but I rejected this outright. 

Meanwhile, Parliament has been reduced to what me and my party views as a rubber stamp for authoritarian policies. Legislation aimed at curbing judicial independence, suppressing free speech, and criminalising dissent has been pushed through without debate. Political disagreement is now labelled as “anti-state” activity, punishable by forced disappearances and draconian anti-terror laws. The last vestiges of democracy in Pakistan have been all but erased.

 

Beyond Parliament, it is also imperative that Pakistan’s Army Chief Syed Asim Munir acknowledges and respects the constitutional boundaries of the military. Only by doing so can Pakistan thrive under a true democratic system—one that is chosen by the people, for the people. History has shown that dictatorships in Pakistan are fleeting, but the damage they inflict lingers for generations, outlasting all those who impose them. The future of our nation depends on upholding democracy, not suppressing it.

 

Yet, despite these dark times, the people of Pakistan have never been more awake or aware. They see through the lies, and their determination gives me hope. The fight for justice and dignity is not an easy one, but it is one worth waging. I firmly believe that truth will prevail. Together, we will rebuild a Pakistan where citizens’ rights are protected and democracy is restored.

 

Outside Pakistan, the world is also at a crossroads. As global challenges—from conflict to economic instability—intensify, the need for strong and principled leadership has never been greater. It is in this context that I extend my heartfelt congratulations to President Donald J. Trump on his historic inauguration in January. His remarkable political comeback is a testament to resilience and the will of the people.

 

During his first tenure, the United States and Pakistan enjoyed a strong working relationship built on mutual respect. As he settles into office again, we look forward to his administration reaffirming its commitment to democratic principles, human rights, and the rule of law—particularly in regions where authoritarianism threatens to undermine these values. A democratic and stable Pakistan is in the interest of the international community, and we will continue to push for that balance to be restored.

 

Additionally, I encourage his administration to strengthen economic partnerships that create opportunities for nations like Pakistan to build self-sustaining economies. Fair trade policies, investment in critical sectors, and a commitment to regional stability will foster prosperity and help prevent the conditions that lead to conflict and extremism. I remain hopeful that this new chapter in U.S. leadership will bring meaningful engagement in these critical areas and contribute to fostering significant peace and progress.

 

As we move forward, I remain resolute in my vision for Pakistan—a nation built on justice, opportunity, and equality. The road ahead will be difficult, but I have no doubt that the people of Pakistan, united in their resolve, will overcome these challenges. Together, we will build a brighter future for generations to come.

 

https://time.com/7262072/imran-khan-writes-from-prison-pakistan/

 


--
Dr Shabir Choudhry

 Prophet Mohammed (PBUH) said: "Say what is true, although it may be bitter and displeasing to people."

Sunday, 16 February 2025

Did Muslims talk about their problems in the Masjid during the life of the Holy Prophet?

 Did Muslims talk about their problems in the Masjid during the life of the Holy Prophet?

Can Muslims Talk in Masjids? Why Mullah’s want to restrict the rights of Muslims? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOzOO-4oZfM

Friday, 31 January 2025

Emperor Aurangzeb:

 Emperor Aurangzeb:

On the topic of Emperor Aurangzeb, we Muslims are told stories about his justice, honesty and piety. Also, we are told he was among the best Muslims, and his services to Islam were brilliant, and his edicts are often quoted by Muslim scholars of South Asia. We are told he was so ‘great’ and down to earth that he was running his financial matters by making head caps in his spare time.

Non-Muslim writers and historians do not agree with all of the above. He spent most of his life fighting either with his family or with non-Muslims, so when was making these valuable head caps to run his financial matters? What kind of head caps did he make that he generated sufficient income to run his financial matters?

Leaving that aside, William Dalrymple a Scottish historian and author of many books on the Sub-continent in his book wrote:

On his deathbed, Aurangzeb acknowledged his failures in a sad and defeated letter to his son, Azam: "I came alone and I go as a stranger. The instant which has passed in power has left only sorrow behind it. I have not been the guardian and protector of the Empire. Life, so valuable, has been squandered in vain. God was in my heart but I could not see him. Life is transient. The past is gone and there is no hope for the future. The whole imperial army is like me: bewildered, perturbed, separated from God, quaking like quicksilver. I fear my punishment. Though I have a firm hope in God’s grace, yet for my deeds anxiety ever remains with me."
https://x.com/DalrympleWill/status/1884123524530364496

Derailment of Democracy, by Tanveer Zahid

 


Derailment of Democracy, by Tanveer Zahid

 

It was on Oct 7 way back in 1958, just little more than eleven years of Pakistan coming into existence, that democracy was derailed for the first time. The author of Pakistan’s first martial law regime was Ayub Khan who had been reprimanded for dereliction of duty by the Quaid-i-Azam some months before his demise in 1948

 

The influx of refugees from India into Pakistan after the creation of a new Muslim country on the world map was the biggest human, administrative problem. Most of the Muslim refugees were coming into Western Punjab from Eastern Punjab. The Quaid-i-Azam had entrusted the important responsibility of looking after the refugees to his trusted lieutenant Sardar Abdul Rab Nishtar. Major-General Ayub Khan was to help him in this gigantic humanitarian task. But Ayub Khan was more interested in spending his evenings in the army mess or some club rather than to assist Sardar Nishtar in the accomplishment of the task assigned by the Quaid-i-Azam. After tolerating this for some time, Sardar Nishtar addressed a letter to the Quaid-i-Azam pointing out what Ayub Khan was doing.

 

Obviously, the Quaid was greatly annoyed. He did not expect such dereliction of duty from a senior army officer and that too within less than one year of Pakistan’s coming into being.

 

The Quaid-i-Azam picked up the holder and wrote with a G nib in black ink on the same (Sardar Nishtar’s) letter:

 

I know this army officer. He is more interested in politics than the army matters.

 

1/ “He is transferred to East Pakistan.

2/ he will not hold any command position for one year.

3/ He will not wear his badges during this period.”

 

The file is lying in the strongroom of the Cabinet Division in Islamabad along with piles of other files as well as the various inquiries held regarding the murders of first Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan and Dr Khan Sahib, Rawalpindi Conspiracy Case, Agartala Conspiracy Case and Justice Hamoodur Rahman Commission Report on the fall of

The file is lying in the strongroom of the Cabinet Division in Islamabad along with piles of other files as well as the various inquiries held regarding the murders of first Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan and Dr Khan Sahib, Rawalpindi Conspiracy Case, Agartala Conspiracy Case and Justice Hamoodur Rahman Commission Report on the fall of Dacca.

 

The Rawalpindi Conspiracy Case has since been declassified and published a couple of years ago. Justice Hamoodur Rahman Commission Report’s some parts have also been declassified and made public some months ago, though it would have been appropriate if the entire report was published to let the people know the whole truth.

 

The inquiry report on the Ojhri Camp fire accident in 1988, which cost Muhammad Khan Junejo his prime ministership, is also another secret file lying in the Cabinet Division.

 

Some years back, there was a move to declassify the inquiries into the murder of Liaquat Ali Khan and Dr Khan Sahib but this did not materialize because some of the characters said to be involved or mentioned in the reports were still alive and the publication of these inquiry reports would be a source of embarrassment to them.

 

Dawn, 29/12/ 2001 (in letter’s section).