When MK Narayanan stalled Siachen deal
IFTIKHAR GILANI | Updated:
Sep 7, 2017, 06:55 AM IST, DNA
In his forthcoming part-history-part-memoir titled How
India Sees the World, Shyam Saran has claimed that he and his Pakistani
counterpart Riaz Mohammad Khan were close to breakthrough
In 2006, the stage was set between India and Pakistan to
clinch a deal over the issue of Siachen — the world's highest battlefield where
the climate has claimed more lives than gunfire — but the process was scuttled
by India's then National Security Advisor (NSA) MK Narayanan, former Foreign
Secretary Shyam Saran has claimed.
In his forthcoming part-history-part-memoir titled How
India Sees the World, Saran has claimed that he and his Pakistani counterpart
Riaz Mohammad Khan were close to breakthrough. He has claimed that the deal was
even consented by the Indian Army, and mentioned its finer points, including
current positions of the forces of the two countries, the positions to which
they would withdraw, a schedule for redeployment, and a joint monitoring mechanism
to prevent mutual intrusions. All this would have been recorded in an annexure
to the main agreement.
In their tumultuous relations, India and Pakistan had
already missed two possible deals on the Himalayan territory — located as high
as 20,000 feet above sea level — in 1989 and 1992.
"To give the document additional strength, we
insisted, and the Pakistani side agreed, that both the agreement and the
annexure will be signed, and that the main agreement will explicitly declare
that the annexure had the same legal validity as the agreement itself,"
records Saran, who also worked as adviser to then Prime Minister Manmohan
Singh.
Prime Minister Singh, who was keen on the agreement had
directed the Foreign Secretary to obtain a consensus from all key stakeholders.
"I did many rounds of consultations, both at the senior bureaucratic and
ministerial levels in the ministries of defence, home and finance (whose
members are part of the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS)," he said.
Saran claimed that then Army Chief General JJ Singh and
the chiefs of all intelligence agencies were also brought on board.
The deal was consented by the Army and its intricate
technical details including the points and timing of redeployment and also the
phases in which it would have been implemented and the structure of the
monitoring mechanism were actually worked out by the Director-General Of
Military Operations.
After all this exercise, when approval from the CCS was
seen as a mere formality, the deal was aborted after Narayanan launched a
bitter offensive. The draft agreement, along with the annexures, had been put
together in a note to the CCS for approval so that it could be presented as a
proposal from the Indian side at the India–Pakistan Defence Secretary-level
talks scheduled for May 2006. The note had been examined and agreed to by all
relevant stakeholders and agencies. The CCS approval was, therefore, expected
to come as a matter of course.
"When the CCS meeting was held on the eve of the
Defence Secretary-level talks, the NSA launched an offensive, saying that
Pakistan could not be trusted, and that there will be political and public
opposition to any such initiative and that India's military position in the
northern sector vis-à-vis both Pakistan and China will be compromised. General
Singh, who had happily gone along with the proposal in its earlier iterations,
now decided to join Narayanan in rubbishing it," records Saran in the
book.
In the meeting, Home Minister Shivraj Patil and Defence
Minister Pranab Mukherjee decided to play it safe and proposed the deferment of
its consideration until further study. The Prime Minister, who was keen to see
the deal through, chose to keep silent. In the ensuing exchange of words,
Narayanan, went further suggesting that Siachen be taken off the agenda of
India–Pakistan talks entirely and that this should be communicated to the
visiting Pakistani Defence Secretary at forthcoming talks. At this stage,
Mukherjee stepped in to support Saran. He pointed out that Rajiv Gandhi himself
had agreed to include Siachen in the India–Pakistan dialogue.
Saran recalls that in 2007, when he visited a couple of
high-altitude posts at the Siachen Glacier as part of a border infrastructure
survey, he informally asked stationed officers it they would support a mutual
withdrawal by India and Pakistan from the glacier. "The answer was an
unqualified yes. I then asked whether we could risk Pakistani occupation of the
area vacated by us. The officers replied that nothing better could happen
because the Pakistanis would suffer 'what we have been going through these past
several years," he records in the book. The opportunity to finally resolve
a long-standing issue and a constant source of bitterness in Pakistan was lost.
Saran has also referred to Prime Minister Atal Bihari
Vajpayee and President Pervez Musharraf's back channel and confidential talks
on Kashmir at their January 2004 meeting in Islamabad, which continued during
Manmohan Singh's era as well. He also mentions another tiff with Narayanan,
when he tried to rock the boat of the Indo-US nuclear deal. Even though being
chief negotiator, Narayanan had excluded him from an apex committee consisting
of the Department Of Atomic Energy and PMO officials.
"It often turned out that I was negotiating with William Burns on
one side and the PMO on the other. Narayanan became the interlocutor between
the negotiating team and the DAE, which seemed to be convinced that we were
about to sell the store to the Americans," he added.
No comments:
Post a Comment