Friday 7 May 2021

Anant Kumar Banerji to Dr Shabir Choudhry

Anant Kumar Banerji to Dr Shabir Choudhry [Official]
MahtfmrttnSpSoch n15f, nohsos2cnr0uh1ed9 ·

Sir, to my mind you are the most unbiased, objective and rational analyst in the field. Though I don't agree with your future vision for the region yet am very sure that about history you are not only one of the most knowledgeable persons but have the courage to call a spade spade. I wonder if you have ever commented on the fact that in the initial years Nehru sincerely and honestly tried for a plebiscite. Though times again you emphasised Pakistan never recognised the right of Kashmiris to decide it for themselves. They wanted to usurp Kashmir lock stock and barrel. The amendment in which the options restrictions to 2 alternatives either India or Pakistan was forced is a case in point. They never commented on the observation of Shaukat Kashmiri that the amendment cannot discard the original option.

My request is that a detailed analytical note be made by you on the initial efforts of Nehru and how efforts were punctured .

Another aspect I believe has not been chronicled is the spontaneous uprise of the people of what to day is AJK. The paradox was the people rebelled against the feudal system yet joined what Sheikh Abdullah called feudal Pakistan. The rebels were largely the ex soldiers of Azad Hind Fauj, which again was a secular Indian nationalistic force yet they chose to side with Pakistan. Patel's desire to give Kashmir to Pakistan and his aversion to Azad Hind Fauj was that a strong factor?

I shall be much obliged if your scholarly comments on these 2 topics are made available.

Wednesday 5 May 2021

Gen Kayani and Gen Pasha ensured no resistance to US Abbottabad raid

Gen Kayani and Gen Pasha ensured no resistance to US Abbottabad raid

NEW YORK: Renowned Pulitzer prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh has made startling revelations in a 10,000 word report about the May 2, Abbottabad raid, which killed Osama bin Laden in 2011, claiming that the raid was planned by the Americans with full knowledge and cooperation of the Pakistan Army and ISI, then headed by General Kayani and General Pasha.

Writing for the London Review of Books, Hersh who had broken famous stories like the Mi Lai massacre in Vietnam and Abu Ghraib prison story in Iraq war, said the White House version that the Osama mission was an all-American affair, and that the senior generals of Pakistan’s Army and Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) were not told of the raid in advance was false, as are many other elements of the Obama administration’s account.

“The most blatant lie was that Pakistan’s two most senior military leaders – General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, Chief of Army Staff, and General Ahmed Shuja Pasha, Director General of the ISI – were never informed of the US mission.”

“This spring I contacted Durrani and told him in detail what I had learned about the Laden’s presence in Abbottabad, and that after his killing the US betrayed promises with Kayani and Pasha and went back on the promise that the killing would not be revealed for about 10 days and would then be claimed as a result of a drone strike.”
Hersh quoted the former ISI chief Gen Asad Durrani saying: “When your version comes out – if you do it – people in Pakistan will be tremendously grateful. For a long time people have stopped trusting what comes out about bin Laden from the official mouths. There will be some negative political comment and some anger, but people like to be told the truth, and what you’ve told me is essentially what I have heard from former colleagues.”

Hersh also claimed in the report that bin Laden had been a prisoner of the ISI at the Abbottabad compound since 2006; that Kayani and Pasha knew of the raid

in advance and had made sure that the two helicopters delivering the US Seals to Abbottabad could cross Pakistani airspace without triggering any alarms; that the CIA did not learn of bin Laden’s whereabouts by tracking his couriers, as the White House has claimed since May 2011, but from a former senior Pakistani intelligence officer who betrayed the secret in return for much of the $25 million reward offered by the US, and that, while Obama did order the raid and the Seal team did carry it out, many other aspects of the administration’s account were false.

Hersh claims that the major US source of his information is a retired senior intelligence official who was knowledgeable about the initial intelligence about bin Laden’s presence in Abbottabad. He also was privy to many aspects of the Seals’ training for the raid, and to the various after-action reports. Two other US sources, who had access to corroborating information, have been longtime consultants to the Special Operations Command.

“I also received information from inside Pakistan about widespread dismay among the senior ISI and military leadership – echoed later by Durrani – over Obama’s decision to go public immediately with news of bin Laden’s death. The White House did not respond to requests for comment,” Hersh reported.

The long Seymour Hersh story also claims that Osama’s body was never buried in the sea and he quotes seamen who were on board the US ship saying they never saw any burial. He also says there was no Islamic scholar to lead the last funeral prayers of Osama.Likewise Hersh claims that the story of Dr Shakil Afridi was an after-thought and another person had been authorised by Gen Kayani to get the DNA of Osama.

Hersh claims that a Pakistani ISI officer had walked into the US Embassy in Islamabad and revealed the presence of Osama in Abbottabad and had claimed a reward of $25 million. “The informant and his family were smuggled out of Pakistan and relocated in the Washington area. He is now a consultant for the CIA,” he claims.

“The truth is that bin Laden was an invalid, but we cannot say that,” he quoted the retired official as saying. “You mean you guys shot a cripple? Who was about to grab his AK-47?” It didn’t take long to get the cooperation we needed, because the Pakistanis wanted to ensure the continued release of American military aid, a good percentage of which was anti-terrorism funding.

Hersh says at one point that spring, Pasha offered the Americans a blunt explanation of the reason Pakistan kept bin Laden’s capture a secret, and why it was imperative for the ISI role to remain secret: “We needed a hostage to keep tabs on al-Qaeda and the Taliban,” Pasha said, according to the retired official. “The ISI was using bin Laden as leverage against Taliban and al-Qaeda activities inside Afghanistan and Pakistan. They let the Taliban and al-Qaeda leadership know that if they ran operations that clashed with the interests of the ISI, they would turn bin Laden over to us. So if it became known that the Pakistanis had worked with us to get bin Laden at Abbottabad, there would be hell to pay.”

“At one of his meetings with Leon Panetta, according to the retired official and a source within the CIA, Pasha was asked by a senior CIA official whether he saw himself as acting in essence as an agent for al-Qaeda and the Taliban. “He answered no, but said the ISI needed to have some control.” The message, as the CIA saw it, according to the retired official, was that Kayani and Pasha viewed bin Laden ‘as a resource, and they were more interested in their (own) survival than they were in the United States.”

According to Hersh, “Pasha and Kayani were responsible for ensuring that Pakistan’s Army and air defence command would not track or engage with the US helicopters used on the mission. The American cell at Tarbela Ghazi was charged with coordinating communications between the ISI, the senior US officers at their command post in Afghanistan, and the two Black Hawk helicopters; the goal was to ensure that no stray Pakistani fighter plane on border patrol spotted the intruders and took action to stop them. The initial plan said that news of the raid shouldn’t be announced straightaway. All units in the Joint Special Operations Command operate under stringent secrecy and the JSOC leadership believed, as did Kayani and Pasha, that the killing of bin Laden would not be made public for as long as seven days, maybe longer. Then a carefully constructed cover story would be issued: Obama would announce that DNA analysis confirmed that bin Laden had been killed in a drone raid in the Hindu Kush, on Afghanistan’s side of the border. The Americans who planned the mission assured Kayani and Pasha that their cooperation would never be made public. It was understood by all that if the Pakistani role became known, there would be violent protests – bin Laden was considered a hero by many Pakistanis – and Pasha and Kayani and their families would be in danger, and the Pakistani Army publicly disgraced.”

https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/12422-gen-kayani-gen-pasha-ensured-no-resistance-to-us-abbottabad-raid

Monday 3 May 2021

Freedom of journalists in Pakistan. Dr Shabir Choudhry.

 

Freedom of journalists in Pakistan.

Dr Shabir Choudhry.    03 May 2021

 

Mr Chairman, friends and colleagues Aslamo Alaykam and very good afternoon to all.

 

Mr Chairman, thank you for giving me this opportunity to express my views in this important webinar on World Press Freedom Day.

 

Right of expression is a fundamental human right. It is sad that some countries go out of their way to ensure that fundamental rights are denied to people, and right of expression is curbed.

 

Free media, electronic and print, play a crucial role in protecting and enhancing rights of citizens and supporting civil society and democracy. In the case of Pakistan, this is not true because the present government is determined to silence all voices of dissent.

 

Without a vibrant and independent media, government and secret agencies and powerful people in society can encroach on the rights of other people.

Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists in its recent report published in The News said, the government has a ‘hidden agenda to strangulate’ freedom of press. The Statement identified the following factors that were endangering lives of the media workers and adding to their problems:

·      Expanding retrenchments,

·      non-payment,

·      delayed payment,

·      Cut in salaries of workers,

·      Diminishing press freedoms,

·      Intensifying censorship and press advice

·      Growing unholy collaboration between media owners and government actors in depriving media workers of their rights

The Statement says by using some of the above tactics the hidden agenda of the government is to “destroy press freedom and crush media workers’ rights in Pakistan in complicity with the media owners through economic strangulation and financial arm-twisting of journalists and crushing of enabling environment for media to flourish". 1

 Because of the government’s anti-media policies, more than 8,000 media workers have lost their jobs.

 

Mr Chairman

Those who bravely face the government pressure, and ignore their arm twisting are systematically harassed, intimidated and they become victims of nefarious propaganda and are called ‘agents’ and ‘traitors’.

 

The media owners who do not implement the policies dictated by the government face very serious financial losses as their channels are taken off the screens, and they are implicated in false cases.

 

The government and the media owners, for their own reasons and vested interests totally ignore the basic mission of journalism and freedom of speech enshrined in the UN Charter; and guaranteed in Article 19 of the Constitution of Pakistan.

 

The report asserts that the government and agencies “exceed their mandates and use coercive means to hound journalists and pressurise media houses to crush freedom of expression and professional journalism".

 

They requested the Parliament and the Judiciary to step in and perform their responsibilities of safeguarding freedom of press. Perhaps they forgot the bitter fact that the Parliament and the Judiciary are also controlled by the Government and the establishment

 

"The International Federation of Journalists and PFUJ are outraged by the attacks on journalists and call for prompt action to arrest those responsible" said a statement released by the journalists' unions.

 

They said these ‘incidents are yet another reminder that Pakistan is the most dangerous country for journalists. Both organizations also reaffirmed their calls on the Pakistani government to take decisive steps against ongoing attacks on the media in the South Asian country. 2

 

Mr Chairman

 

Those who do not obey the orders are attacked and beaten up, their limbs are broken by unknown people. If they still don’t conform, and continue to show dissent, they are abducted and kept for days and months. Sometimes their dead bodies are discovered, but lucky ones are returned after some punishment and serious warnings.

 

Last month, April 2021, a famous journalist Absar Alam was shot in a broad daylight in a park in Islamabad where he went for a walk. His crime was to criticise one of the holy cows in Pakistan. One day he attacked and exposed the holy cow, the next day, he was targeted in a park.

Absar Alam was a former television journalist and the former Chair of the Pakistan Electronic Regulatory Authority, the country’s media regulator. His posts in the Social media were not appreciated by some powerful people, and he received a summons from the Federal Investigation Agency because of this.

Steven Butler, CPJ’s Asia program coordinator, said:

“Today’s shooting of journalist Absar Alam highlights the dangerous climate that all members of the press face in Pakistan if they dare to criticize the country’s powerful military. The perpetrators in this attack, as well as anyone involved in its planning, must be swiftly identified and brought to justice.” 3

In 2020, Pakistan ranked ninth on CPJ’s annual Global Impunity Index, which assesses countries where journalists are murdered regularly and their killers go free; at least 34 journalists have been murdered in Pakistan since CPJ began tracking killings in 1992.

On 18 March 2021, Ajay Lalwani, a non - Muslim journalist was also killed by a gunshot in Sukkur, Sindh Province, Pakistan. He was killed in the Salehpat area of Sukkur when two motorcycles and a car with four passengers drove by and opened fire, striking Lalwani in the stomach, arm, and knee.

 

Of course, he was killed by unknown men who used two motorcycles and a car to kill one unarmed man. A popular saying in Pakistan on this is: ye jo namloom hain, sab ko maloom hain, but people are afraid to speak out because they can also get a bullet in their stomach. 4

 

Mr Chairman

Political activists and journalists hailing from Pakistan or Pakistani occupied territories are not even safe in places like Canada and Europe.

 

Karima Baloch, Sajid Hussain Baloch, Shaukat Kashmiri, Jamil Maqsood and, of course, many others and me included are victims of the Pakistani State because we courageously and logically provide counter narrative that is strongly detested by the Pakistani establishment.


Just to refresh memories of the people, Sajid Hussain Baloch, was editor-in-chief of the online news magazine Balochistan Times, and was killed, and his dead body was discovered near the Swedish city of Uppsala.

 

Similarly, Karima Baloch’s dead body was found in Toronto, Canada. She was courageous and inspiring human rights activist, who according to the BBC report ‘was a vocal critic of the Pakistani military and state'.

 

Dissidents, critics, and freedom lovers have to pay a price in Islamic Republic of Pakistan and in areas under their control.

 

Mr Chairman, I must point out that the situation of right of expression is much worse in so called Azad Kashmir and Gilgit Baltistan, both parts of the former Princely State of Jammu and Kashmir.

 

We cannot even publish books which provide facts about Jammu and Kashmir and challenge the Pakistani narrative on Jammu and Kashmir. Many books are banned, which include a number of my books too. My bank accounts are still frozen; and I still cannot visit my village and the grave of my father.

 

One newspaper, Majadla was banned in so-called Azad Kashmir because it published a survey report which showed that 73.6% of the local people expressed their desire to become an independent country.

 

A journalist, Mr Tanveer Ahmed, a British citizen, is in prison in so-called Azad Kashmir for taking off the Pakistani flag, which should not have been there in the first place.

 

In my opinion, he was punished because he visited all the towns of so-called Azad Kashmir and villages and surveyed ten thousand people to ask if they wanted to join Pakistan or become independent. The result was 73.6% in favour of independence and the Pakistani establishment could not tolerate that.

 

In view of the Pakistani establishment, people like Tanveer Ahmed must be punished because they logically present the case of Jammu and Kashmir and that endangers Pakistan’s out of date narrative on Jammu and Kashmir dispute.

 

In conclusion, Mr Chairman I will say that if journalists could be shot in daylight in Islamabad, abducted, shot and killed which highly monitored and controlled with helps of tens of thousands of CCTVs and security men, then you can imagine the plight of journalists working in Balochistan, former FATA, Gilgit Baltistan and so-called Azad Kashmir.

 

We people have no choice but to stand up and organise ourselves against this oppression, tyranny, and injustice. In my opinion, this is true jihad, as we are speaking for the rights of downtrodden and voiceless people.

 

I sincerely hope that one day our struggle will succeed, and our future generations will live in a society that will be more tolerant, peaceful, fair, and accommodative.

 

 

Reference:

 

1.    https://www.thenews.com.pk/latest/776680-pfuj-says-govt-has-a-hidden-agenda-to-strangulate-freedom-of-press

2.    Ibid

3.     https://cpj.org/2021/04/journalist-absar-alam-shot-wounded-in-pakistan/

4.     https://cpj.org/2021/03/pakistaniurnalist-ajay-lalwani-dies-after-suffering-three-gunshot-wounds/