Sunday, 5 October 2014

Left out, Waqar Gillani

Left out, Waqar Gillani
“Free Baba Jan; abolish the anti-terrorism courts; and end political victimisation” were some of the main slogans chanted by a handful activists of Awami Workers Party (AWP) outside Lahore Press Club last week, calling for the release of the prisoners charged of terrorism in Gilgit-Baltistan.

A local anti-terrorism court of Gilgit sentenced Baba Jan, one of the key activist and representative of the AWP, to life in prison along with 11 other campaigners of rights of the marginalised of the northern underdeveloped areas.

The issue, stirring small scale protests and national public disapproval, activated the party’s committed supporters to come out on the streets in different cities and take up the matter in AWP’s first federal congress, held in Islamabad last week. The AWP — a product of late 2012 amalgamation of three Left-wing parties Awami Party, Workers Party and Labour Party — expressed determination to continue its struggle for the revival of working class’ politics and the unity of progressive forces in Pakistan.

Jan, in his early 30s, who is leading Progressive Youth Front in Gilgit, and the other sentenced protestors will spend 40 additional years in prison, besides paying 500,000 rupees in fines, according to the verdict. Further, the convicts’ properties and earnings will be used to reconstruct buildings damaged and assets put on fire on August 11, 2011 in Aliabad, Hunza. The protestors were charged with attacking and vandalising government buildings in Aliabad after police killed an unarmed man and his son who were Internally Displaced People (IDPs) belonging to the disaster-hit Ayeenabad village of Gojal Valley, upper Hunza.

The AWP launched #FreeGB12 (Free Gilgit Baltistan 12 activists) campaign on twitter after the verdict on Jan and other activists. They held peaceful protests and raised voice for the IDPs who were not given any financial compensation by the GB government.
Abid Minto says the party was an outcome of years-long struggle to resurrect the Pakistani Left. He believed with this new united platform, Pakistani Left was now on its way to becoming a strong political force.
In January 2010, a mountain collapsed into Hunza River, creating Attabad Lake. As the lake formed, village after village was submerged. Over 1000 local people were displaced and over 25,000 were cut off from the rest of the country. Many families did not receive financial compensation that allegedly went to the families supporting the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP).
Following the protests, a case was lodged against Jan and others. Jan remained in jail for two years (2011-13) and was granted bail after a series of protests and national and international campaigns by his party supporters such as Noam Chomsky and Tariq Ali. He presented himself before the police after the verdict was announced. His party denies allegations of burning government properties.

“We demand immediate release of Baba Jan and 11 other activists from GB,” Qalandar Bux Memon, a comrade who teaches at a Lahore’s private university and is organising the campaign demanding the activist’s release, told TNS. “These are political prisoners and their sin is giving awareness to the marginalised communities of their areas about their rights.” He said the AWP always called for intellectual and political freedom. “This campaign would continue.”
The recently held national congregation of the AWP reiterated the commitment to broaden the party network and grab more space on the political canvas of the country. The party, a blend of slums’ residents, trade unionists, farmers, and students among others, want rights for the poor, marginalised, land redistribution for workers and peasants, reduction in the defence budget and reallocation of the government spending to address issues relating to health, education and unemployment.

Abid Hasan Minto, President of the AWP, said the party was an outcome of years-long struggle to resurrect the Pakistani Left. He believed with this new united platform, Pakistani Left was now on its way to becoming a strong political force struggling for socialism, equality and justice in the country. “Mainstream parties have practically neglected the working class,” he said. “We don’t want a revolution that does not involve workers rights. The AWP would revive the Leftist traditions and engage youth to deal with contemporary challenges.”

“The party is preparing an anti-capitalist, anti-feudal, anti-patriarchy and anti-imperialist youth force to achieve transformative changes in the country.” Minto said the party is struggling against the neo-colonial imperialist onslaught and its control of Pakistani financial institutions. The party is also fighting against the rising extremism and social and economic crises faced by Pakistan.

Related article: Shrinking space for liberals by Rubina Saigol
Interestingly, in a recent ardent appeal, made on twitter, Chairman Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) Bilwal Bhutto welcomed and encouraged all leftwing parties to join the political process. “If a PPP sympathiser desires to attend a political event, I would suggest him to attend the AWP Congress (recently held in Islamabad).”

The AWP, on its official social network websites, appreciated Bilawal for realising that AWP is a genuine alternative force determined to end social, economic and ideological oppression in Pakistan.
Interestingly, Bilawal is extending support to a party (AWP) which is demonstrating against political victimisation and calling for the release of political prisoners in GB, where his party rules. “Bilawal’s statement seems contradictory. We are struggling against feudalism and the PPP represents feudatory,” said Sajid Baloch, an AWP protestor outside Lahore Press Club, adding, “the PPP acted too late on the Attabad Lake issue.”


Army wiped out 14 militants in backdrop of worst Jammu and Kashmir floods

Army wiped out 14 militants in backdrop of worst Jammu and Kashmir floods
Massive rescue and relief operations notwithstanding, the Indian army has gone the whole hog against militantskilling at least 14 of them and arresting six more. The operation against militants was carried out with the worst floods in the backdrop in September across the Jammu and Kashmir.
"The terrorist activities in September were overshadowed by floods in Kashmir. However, the month saw a number of infiltration attempts and terrorist movement which was foiled by the army, resulting in the elimination of 14 terrorists and apprehension of six others", said Colonel SD Goswami, defence spokesman at Northern Command headquarters.
Colonel Goswami said that with rains lashing the valley causing large-scale flooding in parts of South Kashmir, the army eliminated three terrorists in an encounter at Hanjan Bala near Shopian on September 2.
Within a week, four more terrorists were eliminated at Laribal near Rajwar and Pharkian on September 9 and 10 when Srinagar was reeling under the worst floods. Two more terrorists were eliminated at Machhal on September 17 followed by four more at Tangdhar in Kupwara district on September 19.
Thereafter, one more terrorist was killed at Lolab in Kupwara district on September 30 bringing the total number of terrorists dying in September to 14.
"During the same month, a number of local terrorists were apprehended with the help of Special Operations Group of Police", Colonel Goswami said.
The army's operations against the ultras continued despite the fact that 30,000 troops were deployed for rescue and relief efforts in flood-hit areas. Besides three teams of Naval commandos too were pressed into service to help in rescue operation in north Kashmir. Sixty four transport aircrafts and helicopters of Indian Air Force and Army Aviation Corps were pressed into service for rescue and relief work.
Official figures reveal that 12.5 lakh families have been affected by the floods which claimed 281 lives—196 in Jammu province and 85 in Kashmir valley. Around 29 persons have also been reportedly missing in the floods. Around 5,642 villages were affected across the state. As many as 800 villages were submerged for over two weeks.
"There are now an estimated 8,00,000 internally displaced persons [IDPs] in Jammu and Kashmir. There has been a complete breakdown of an already overburdened healthcare system", said a joint spokesman of doctors and civil society groups.


Army wiped out 14 militants in backdrop of worst Jammu and Kashmir floods

Army wiped out 14 militants in backdrop of worst Jammu and Kashmir floods
Massive rescue and relief operations notwithstanding, the Indian army has gone the whole hog against militantskilling at least 14 of them and arresting six more. The operation against militants was carried out with the worst floods in the backdrop in September across the Jammu and Kashmir.
"The terrorist activities in September were overshadowed by floods in Kashmir. However, the month saw a number of infiltration attempts and terrorist movement which was foiled by the army, resulting in the elimination of 14 terrorists and apprehension of six others", said Colonel SD Goswami, defence spokesman at Northern Command headquarters.
Colonel Goswami said that with rains lashing the valley causing large-scale flooding in parts of South Kashmir, the army eliminated three terrorists in an encounter at Hanjan Bala near Shopian on September 2.
Within a week, four more terrorists were eliminated at Laribal near Rajwar and Pharkian on September 9 and 10 when Srinagar was reeling under the worst floods. Two more terrorists were eliminated at Machhal on September 17 followed by four more at Tangdhar in Kupwara district on September 19.
Thereafter, one more terrorist was killed at Lolab in Kupwara district on September 30 bringing the total number of terrorists dying in September to 14.
"During the same month, a number of local terrorists were apprehended with the help of Special Operations Group of Police", Colonel Goswami said.
The army's operations against the ultras continued despite the fact that 30,000 troops were deployed for rescue and relief efforts in flood-hit areas. Besides three teams of Naval commandos too were pressed into service to help in rescue operation in north Kashmir. Sixty four transport aircrafts and helicopters of Indian Air Force and Army Aviation Corps were pressed into service for rescue and relief work.
Official figures reveal that 12.5 lakh families have been affected by the floods which claimed 281 lives—196 in Jammu province and 85 in Kashmir valley. Around 29 persons have also been reportedly missing in the floods. Around 5,642 villages were affected across the state. As many as 800 villages were submerged for over two weeks.
"There are now an estimated 8,00,000 internally displaced persons [IDPs] in Jammu and Kashmir. There has been a complete breakdown of an already overburdened healthcare system", said a joint spokesman of doctors and civil society groups.


Pakistan Army Chief Seen Keeping Premier Sharif on Edge - Bloomberg

Aboard a private bus heading to the funeral of a Pakistani army instructor, Raheel Sharif fumed as a small television set showed provocative dancers. Finally he took matters into his own hands.
“He stood, smashed the screen with some object and shouted ‘Don’t you guys have any decency? Families are sitting here and you screened such rubbish,’” Simon Sharaf, a former roommate of Sharif who witnessed the exchange back in 1993, said in an interview in Rawalpindi, home to the military’s headquarters. “Nobody dared to move or say anything.”
Two decades later, Raheel Sharif is keeping Pakistan’s civilian leaders on edge as army chief even as he refrains from seizing power in a country with a long history of military rule. Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, who was ousted in a 1999 coup and isn’t related to the army chief, has seen his authority diminish in recent months as the military’s has risen.

The standoff is increasing Raheel Sharif’s influence over government policies, particularly how to handle often terse relations with neighboring countries as the U.S. begins reducing its troop presence in Afghanistan. Nawaz Sharif’s moves to seek peace talks with nuclear-armed India and Taliban militants operating along the Afghan border are indefinitely stalled.
“Eventually there will be a negotiated outcome -- brokered by the military -- that keeps the government in power, offers some concessions to the protesters, and above all makes the military even stronger than it has been,” Michael Kugelman, an Asia analyst at the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington, said by e-mail of the political impasse. “The military will likely take over the India and Afghanistan portfolios, jeopardizing -- unfortunately -- the progress the civilians have made toward rapprochement with both of those countries.”
Power Broker 
Nawaz Sharif bypassed two more senior generals last year when he appointed Raheel Sharif, who was seen as an apolitical choice that would enhance civilian control of the armed forces. Tensions slowly rose as the government sought talks with Taliban militants and brought treason charges against former military ruler Pervez Musharraf, who had ousted Nawaz Sharif in 1999.
Now, after six of weeks of protests led by opposition leader Imran Khan, Raheel Sharif has asserted the army’s role as power broker.
In mid-August, Khan and religious cleric Muhammad Tahir-ul-Qadri moved past police lines into a restricted zone and set up camp in parliament. Nawaz Sharif then held meetings with Raheel Sharif to help resolve the impasse.
‘Building Himself’ 
Raheel Sharif met separately with Khan, Qadri, Nawaz Sharif and his brother Shahbaz Sharif, who leads Pakistan’s state of Punjab. Nawaz Sharif later told parliament he never asked Raheel Sharif to mediate a solution, prompting Khan to file a lawsuit with the Supreme Court seeking the prime minister’s disqualification for lying.
“Raheel Sharif has shown significant restraint at events that in the past may have provoked a coup,” Oliver Coleman, an analyst at Maplecroft, a U.K.-based global risk forecasting company, said in e-mailed comments. The opposition Pakistan Peoples Party is seeking closed-door talks between political parties and the military, which has ruled the nuclear-armed country for about half its history.
Amid the protests, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s administration scrapped the first formal talks planned with Pakistan in two years after its envoy sought to meet Kashmiri separatist groups. The army has also continued a fight against Islamic militants on the border with Afghanistan, where the Taliban is seeking to regain power as the U.S. withdraws troops over the next few years.
Fighting Militants 
“Sharif is building himself up,” Ayesha Siddiqa, author of Military Inc., a book about Pakistan’s armed forces, said by phone from Islamabad, referring to the army chief. “Maximum manipulation ensures civil institutions remain weak and cannot challenge the military.”
Raheel Sharif, 58, was born in Quetta on the Afghan border in a military family. He and his brothers followed in the footsteps of his father, a major. One of his brothers, Mumtaz Sharif, is a captain, while elder brother Major Shabbir Sharif was killed in 1971 while battling Indian soldiers during one of three wars between the neighboring countries.
After earning a degree from the Royal College of Defence Studies in the U.K., Raheel Sharif started as infantry officer and later oversaw the army’s training operations. At one point he was a military instructor at the Pakistan Military Academy in Abbottabad, near where Osama bin Laden was hiding before he was killed in 2011.
Warfare Training 
Raheel Sharif is Pakistan’s first army chief who hasn’t seen combat with 
India, and regards home-grown militants as an existential threat on the same level, according to Burzine Waghmar, an academic at the Centre for the Study of Pakistan at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London.
“He remains committed to rooting, not rehabilitating militants -- unlike dangerously naive Nawaz or Islamist-veering Imran,” Waghmar said in an e-mail. He’s developed counter-insurgency and low-level warfare training for rank-and-file soldiers, something that hadn’t been part of the military’s strategic thinking prior to 2007, he said.
Raheel Sharif rarely speaks in public, with his only comments coming through the army spokesman’s office since the latest political crisis began. Raheel Sharif’s office didn’t respond to an interview request, and Pakistan army spokesman Asim Bajwa didn’t return a message left at his office yesterday.
Not Talkative 
Pakistan’s top general is also reserved in private, according to those who’ve worked with him over the years.
“He isn’t talkative,” said retired Lieutenant General Asif Yasin Malik, the former top bureaucrat in the defense ministry. “But when he speaks, he speaks clearly.”

The army’s popularity has risen in Pakistan, according to a survey published in August by Pew Research Center. Some 87 percent of respondents said it has a good influence, compared with 79 percent in 2013. Nawaz Sharif’s favorable rating dropped slightly to 64 percent, it said.
Abdul Qadir Baloch, a member of Nawaz Sharif’s cabinet who previously served as Raheel Sharif’s commander for three years, said the army chief remains courteous when they meet in private.
“He believes in democracy and constitution, but there is pressure,” Baloch said. “The army has a mindset. It ruled the country for more than half its existence, so there is always pressure.”

Pakistan Army Chief Seen Keeping Premier Sharif on Edge - Bloomberg

Source: http://defence.pk/threads/pakistan-army-chief-seen-keeping-premier-sharif-on-edge.337360/#ixzz3FIgN7xsN

Saturday, 4 October 2014

Sindh Chief Minister talks about exploitation of Sindh by Punjab and Federation of Pakistan

Sindh Chief Minister talks about exploitation of Sindh by Punjab and Federation of Pakistan
Chief Minister of Sindh Government Qaim Ali Shah has said that Sindh is being exploited and victimized. He said that even after contributing 72 percent oil and natural gas in Pakistan, Sindh is given lesser return of 22 percent and Punjab province is being given 45 percent; however the natural resources contribution of Punjab in the federation is 6 percent. He further said that the cooks and Imams of the mosques in the oil resources companies are being hired from outside Sindh. He said that Sindhis are being treated as baggers in Pakistan. (He was hinting at Punjab). News Courtesy: Daily Awami Awaz.

Chief Minister Sindh said this while talking to a public gathering in Jhol Tahsil (sub-district) of district Sanghar. There is mass movement in Sanghar and other districts of Sindh for the employment rights and natural resources in Sindh. Sanghar, being a stronghold of Pakistan Muslim League – Functional (PML-F) and Pir Pagaro’s Hur Jammat, recently created a greater public pressure for the natural resources rights. A couple of days ago, Sindh Police, in association with other armed forces, raided PML-F Parliamentarian’s house in the fake cases, which turned into an armed conflict between residents of Jhol and the armed forces. Sanghar district has also observed shutter-down strike over the incident. Sindhi people, mostly led by Sindhi nationalists, have been massively protesting for royalty, employment and other rights associated with the natural resources of Sindh. 



Friday, 3 October 2014

Teenaged girl killed in Pak shelling near border

Teenaged girl killed in Pak shelling near border
A 17-year-old girl was killed and four other civilians injured in Poonch district on Friday during stepped up firing by Pakistan at different places along the Line of Control (LoC) and the international border in Jammu Kashmir.

Identifying the deceased as Jara Akhtar, sources said that she died at village Gigriyal in Saujjian area in Poonch district during mortar shelling by Pakistani troops from across the LoC. Five other villagers were also injured as mortar shells rained on the village, sources said, adding that they included Ghulam Mohammad, 60, Sher Bagh, 52, Zulfikar Ahmed, 17, and Javed Iqbal, 14.
The shelling which started around 2 pm Friday in Saujjian area came nearly 36 hours after six civilian including two women got injured and nearly half a dozen houses damaged in unprovoked mortar shelling by it on civilian areas in the same area.
Related

A Defence Ministry spokesman Lt Colonel Manish Mehta here said that Pakistani troops resorted to yet another ceasefire violation targeting the Indian side with small arms fire in the same area on Friday afternoon. The firing from across the LoC continued from 2 pm to 3.30 pm, he said, adding that the Indian army also retaliated. However, there was no casualty or damage on the side of Indian army.
Meanwhile, sources said that unprovoked firing by Pakistani troops re-started after a brief halt and this time, they started targeting civilian areas on the Indian side with mortar shells. Some of the mortars fell on Gigriyal village causing civilian casualty, they said, adding that a few houses were also damaged.

There was panic in the village with people having fled to safer places in view of Pakistani troops targeting them with mortars for the second time since Wednesday night when six people including two women had got injured and nearly half a dozen houses damaged.

Meanwhile, Pakistani Rangers also resorted to unprovoked small arms fire on two forward Indian positions – Pittal Post and Tent Guard, along the international border in Arnia sector late this evening. The BSF also retaliated and the exchange of fire between the two sides was continuing when reports last came in late in the night.

The latest spate of ceasefire violations have started less than 24 hours after both US President Barack Obama and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi during nearly two hour long meeting between them in Washington, had committed to “joint and concerted efforts that include dismantling safe havens for terrorists and criminal networks, disrupting financial and tactical support for Lashkar-e-Toiba, Jaish-e-Mohammed, D-company and Haqqani network”.

The unprovoked mortar shelling by Pakistan has also come after a lull of over a month as earlier in August this year, its troops had been continuously resorting to heavy firing and mortar shelling on civilian areas not only along the LoC, but also along the international border in Jammu and Samba districts. The Pakistani firing, which BSF top officials described as heaviest since 1971 Indo-Pak war, had also led to migration of people from various villages in R S Pura, Arnia and Ramgarh


Pakistan Welcomes Afghan US Bilateral Security Pact;

Pakistan Welcomes Afghan US Bilateral Security Pact; Analysts Uncertain
Oct. 2, 2014  By USMAN ANSARI   
ISLAMABAD — Pakistan’s civil and military leadership has welcomed the signing of the Afghan-US Bilateral Security Agreement (BSA) and pledged support for the new Afghan government, but analysts are doubtful of the long-term regional security and stability.
Government officials have said a continued Western military presence in Afghanistan to train and support the Afghan military would be beneficial. This reverses the previous view that a long-term Western military presence in Afghanistan was destabilizing.
Gen Raheel Sharif, head of the Army, was quoted in Pakistani media as saying the deal was “a good move for durable peace in Afghanistan” during a Corps Commander’s meeting at the Army’s General Headquarters in Rawalpindi.
Officials hoped the continued Western military presence could help stop Afghanistan from sliding into a civil war. The agreement comes as Kabul’s new government has pledged not to allow Afghan territory to be used against its neighbors.
Analysts are unconvinced.
“I doubt it will make any difference at all to Pakistan,” said analyst, author and former Australian defense attache to Islamabad, Brian Cloughley. “The BSA is just a formal document required by the US to enable its forces and those of some other NATO countries to remain in country.”
His views are echoed by Salma Malik, assistant professor, in the Department of Defence & Strategic Studies, at Islamabad’s Quaid-i-Azam University.
“The BSA gives Pakistan a semblance of security that the ISAF[International Security Assistance Force] or at least the US forces continue their presence and commitment in the neighboring Afghanistan,” she said.
However, she questions the level of commitment.
“What we don’t take into account fully is that the US mentally packed its bags two to three years back and this is just a cleanup job, compounded by new emerging threats and problems which compel the US and Western powers to focus elsewhere.”
Claude Rakisits, nonresident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council’s South Asia Center, however, is generally more supportive and says it disproves previous Pakistani fears.
“Pakistani academics, analysts and officials, civilian and military, have been asserting in the lead-up to 2014 that the US would once again leave Pakistan to its own devices as it had after the Soviets left Afghanistan in 1989,” he said.
“This was never going to be the case because the two situations are completely different in time [25 years] and the issues [terrorism was not present and Pakistan is now a nuclear-armed state],” he added.
Therefore, he believes “America’s continued presence in Afghanistan, albeit a limited one in numbers and in time, will be good news for bilateral relations between Islamabad and Washington.”
Despite the agreement and the new Afghan government, Cloughley says serious problems threaten even its short-term stability.
“Afghanistan is collapsing even further under the weight of Taliban assaults, while the warlords remain in the background for the moment, reaping the profits from drug production, kidnapping and general mayhem,” he said.
Even Rakisits concedes that in this regard the BSA may not deliver additional security for Pakistan.
“I seriously doubt that the presence of less than 10,000 US military personnel, the bulk of whom will be trainers and advisers to the Afghan military, will make much of a difference to Pakistan’s own security. The limited special forces personnel based in Afghanistan will be involved in hunting down al-Qaida terrorists rather than the TTP [Pakistani Taliban],” he said.
“The injection of $8 billion annually of military aid should help the Afghan security forces deal with the Afghan Taliban and hopefully the TTP when they cross over into Afghanistan. How effective the Afghan forces will be is, of course, another issue,” he said. “The Afghan Taliban have successfully conducted a number of attacks in Afghanistan recently, and this despite the presence of 40,000 ISAF troops still in the country.”
“So all in all, it is doubtful that the TTP and their fellow ideological travelers will feel under too much pressure from the Afghan military, which will have its own problems to deal with,” Rakisits added.
“One must not forget that the BSA is only a temporary and limited military assistance crutch for three years,” he said.
Ultimately, Afghan “stability, and therefore security” rests in the hands of the newly appointed government being able to work together and overcome Afghanistan’s numerous problems. However, he has little faith in this. Therefore, by extension, the longer-term security implications for Pakistan are also bleak. ■