Wednesday, 16 November 2016

Islamic State Khorasan Province Pakistan’s - New Foreign Policy Tool? By Khyber Sarban

Islamic State Khorasan Province Pakistan’s - New Foreign Policy Tool? By Khyber Sarban     November 15, 2016
ISKP is nothing but Pakistan’s new terror syndicate to prolong the war in Afghanistan under the banner of ISIS.
Recently, Islamic State Khorasan Province (ISKP) activity in the outskirts of Nangarhar, Afghanistan have once again made it to the headlines. As per reports a few months back, Afghan and U.S. forces and authorities claimed to have broken the back of ISKP. But somehow ISKP has reappeared stronger than before, with greater numbers and extremely sophisticated heavy and light weaponry.
In addition to that, ISKP assassinated another tribal leader, Malik Qasim Khan, who was leading the fight against them. That makes the third anti-ISKP tribal leader in a row. Moreover, amid the fighting ISKP has taken many locals as prisoners to their sanctuaries in the mountains. Distant villages located in the Afghan side of Spinghar Mountains, to the west of the Durand Line, are regularly besieged and remain so until aerial support arrives. It is now reported that ISKP has not only restarted their radio transmissions but also expanded it to five languages.
It is by now an established fact that defying the Soviet Union in Afghanistan with extremist insurgent groups has had a lethal impact on the immediate region, if not globally. The second mistake was outsourcing the Afghanistan post-Soviet withdrawal to Pakistan, which in turn managed safe havens for regional and transnational terrorist groups that Afghanistan is still grappling with. Sanctuaries and support to these groups were provided by Pakistani intelligence either directly or via its various “veritable arms” Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LeJ), Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), and the notorious Haqqani Network, who in their turn never shied away from harboring their ideological siblings like al-Qaeda. We have witnessed the backlash of this abhorrent policy in the region in the shape of the Taliban as well as the simultaneous re-establishing and further expansion of al-Qaeda under the Taliban regime and its far-reaching terror activities and consequences beyond the region. Meanwhile the Western world was jolted awake from its decade long negligence thanks to the horrific attack on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.
Once again, the very same sponsor of the Taliban and al-Qaeda has decided to establish a terror group — this time, the regional variant of the Islamic State (ISIS) known as the Islamic State of Khorasan Province (ISKP). This new brand of terrorism is key for prolonging the conflict in the region, thus establishing Pakistan’s role in any counter activities and providing a perfect tool for squeezing out more foreign funds and perks. It is a well-calculated game plan and one that is attractive in the region, at least for the time being. For example, an assertive Russia does not mind the propagation of the ISIS threat in Afghanistan and the immediate region, as it gives Kremlin the perfect card to deal with Central Asian Republics who have tried to stay away from Moscow’s sway for the past two decades. At the same time, it provides Iran the option to increase its sectarian-based geostrategic interference in the region, thus inviting Gulf States to counter activities in Afghanistan and the region.
It is within this regional geopolitical calculus that the ISKP phenomenon has been brought to fore as the next big thing. Although ISKP is linked to the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, in fact it is a totally distinct phenomenon and specifically designed for this region. However, the connection between ISIS and ISKP in the Afghanistan-Pakistan region can be traced back to when thousands of Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LeJ), Tehrik Taliban Pakistan (TTP), Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU), and al-Qaeda members and affiliates were recruited and sent to Syria to fight alongside Syrian rebels against the Assad regime. After the split between al-Qaeda and ISIS leader al-Baghdadi, most of these recruits sided with the latter instead of their long term allies al-Qaeda. Months after this split when Islamic State emerged in 2013, LeJ’s top leadership went to Saudi Arabia and “met Islamic State leaders at an undisclosed location at Saudi-Iraq border area.” The visiting delegation from LeJ also extended an invitation to Islamic State leaders to visit Pakistan for more recruitment and support.
The Islamic State, being at odds with al-Qaeda whose presence in the Afghanistan-Pakistan region is a well-known fact, welcomed the gesture. After almost a year, in September 2014, a three-member ISIS delegation,headed by Zubair al-Kuwaiti and including Sheikh Yusuf from Saudi Arabia and Uzbek commander Fahim Ansari were received in Islamabad. The group was escorted to Rawalpindi to meet Jamaat ud Dawa and held talks with members of Jamaat Islami of Pakistan. The ISIS delegation went on to meet several commanders of the various TTP’s wings, including Lashkar-e-Islam Chief Mangal Bagh. The message delivered by the ISIS delegation, was plain and simple: Unite to secure IS support.
The TTP and others began running a propaganda and recruitment campaign for ISIS. On December 14, the Army Public School massacre took place. After the attack, the TTP continued its campaign of recruitment. On January 10, 2015 six TTP commanders announced their allegiance to ISIS via video message. On January 26, ISIS accepted the TTP commanders’ allegiance and announced the establishment of Islamic State of ‘Khorasan Province’ (ISKP), chosing Hafiz Saeed Orakzai as its leader. That is the basis of the connection between IS and ISKP.
ISKP in the Afghanistan-Pakistan region is not cut of the same cloth as the Islamic State we have witnessed in Syria and Iraq; therefore it is a mistake to think of them as the same. The regional brand of ISKP in the making is more a consortium of several TTP fragmented groups combined with the already existing LeJ, JuD, Jem, Jundullah, IMU, disgruntled Taliban groups, and a dozen other groups nurtured through the decades in Afghanistan and Pakistan. These terrorist outfits tasked to operate under the banner of ISKP are more like a marriage of convenience than a union based on shared ideology. It is to be noted that these groups have always operated for decades with the blessings of the Pakistani state and its intelligence wing. They are highly dependent on each other for continued existence.
This facilitation of the activities of terror groups by Pakistani Intelligence has precedence. For decades, terror outfits have used Pakistan to travel to and from various conflict zones, often with the connivance of Pakistani intelligence officials as was evident most recently in the case of former Taliban leader Mullah Mohammad Mansour. These terror groups are bargaining chips, as Asad Durrani told Al Jazeera. Despite Pakistan’s alliance in the war of terror, specifically targeting al-Qaeda, the group is still active and has now established an al-Qaeda Indian Subcontinent (AQIS) wing. The terror groups active in the region had their own distinct operating principles, but since the emergence of ISIS we have witnessed a systematic attempt to make the outside world believe that they all now operate under Islamic State. For example, previously the LeJ and LeT groups were operating across the Durand Line under the banner of Haqqani Network and since the emergence of ISIS they have been rebranded.
ISKP needs a territory to establish itself, from which it can operate, show strength, and remain unscathed but above all from which it can easily be supported and supplied. The latter has proven to be crucial for proxy groups’ survival, as seen in the examples of the Taliban, Haqqani Network and al-Qaeda.
The territory designated for establishing ISKP is strategically located and agriculturally self-sufficient, consisting of a complex web of caves, passes, villages, and routes stretching from Khost, Paktia, and Logar provinces via Nangarhar to Kunar and Nuristan. It is easily accessible from the already-established proxy routes across the Durand Line. Pachir wa Agam district of Nangarhar province is to be the center of gravity for this purpose. First, Pachir wa Agam district borders the infamous Tora Bora mountains and cave complexes, which have proven to be the perfect sanctuaries for extremist and terror outfits. Second, Pachir wa Agam serves as a vantage point to reach Achin and Nazyan districts to its east, Surkhrod district and Jalalabad city to its north, and Sherzad and Khogyani districts to its west. ISKP and its handlers are of the opinion that the Afghan Army is incapable of ever penetrating or pushing them from Tora Bora and they anticipate that the United States will not wage a full-fledged counterterror offensive similar to the one in 2001.
Third, this area, including Pachir wa Agam district, borders Kurram Agency, which is the closest point in Pakistan to Kabul. Kurram Agency, with its many Pakistani military installations and training camps, has been at the service of terrorist and extremist outfits since the start of the war against the Soviet Union. This makes the newly chosen territory for ISKP well within reach of the Pakistan Army, its paramilitaries also known as the Frontier Constabularies (FC), and its vast intelligence network right across the Durand Line. ISKP is thus will continue to be supplied from Kurram Agency via two routes: the Zeran Pass, which is the shortest and has the lowest altitude in the Spinghar Mountains but unusable in the winter season. The other route is via the Nazyan Pass, which is a well-known smuggling route, fit for providing year round access but slightly longer. The journey from militant bases in Kurram Agency via Nazyan Pass takes two-and-a-half hours, half an hour by car and two hours by mule.
Last, it is an established fact that drug traffickers had a substantial presence in the region that ISKP is aiming at. Aside from drug trafficking, the area itself has a significant amount of opium production. Both the Pakistani Intelligence and TTP are known for earning revenue from the drug trade and for using drug money to support themselves. The same will continue, but now under the name of ISKP.
To this end the Pakistan deep state and its army are prepared to go to any distance to provide military, logistical, and financial supply to ISKP. Contrary to the assumption that ISKP mainly consists of TTP splinter factions and operates on its own, a closer look at its fighting tactics and operational capacity reveals more. For example, the ISKP in Nangarhar were twice attacked, once by the Taliban and then by Afghan and U.S. forces. But after each assault they regrouped in greater numbers and were better equipped. This rapid supply and refill in the aftermath of each assault hints at a systematic supply chain of ISKP managed by the Pakistan Army.
Contrary to what is propagated, the manpower of ISKP comprises a mixture of Pakistani Army regulars, the Frontier Constabularies (FC), and a combination of TTP splinter factions and LeJ/JuD/JeM affiliates, depending on the territory assigned to them. Looking at the track record of Pakistan along the LoC, its recipe for mixing up Pakistan Army regulars and irregulars has been a tested formula for decades. The material power of ISKP comprises heavy and precise weaponry, which can only be at the disposal of and operated by the Pakistani Army or paramilitary forces such as FC and Rangers. The fact is that operating these sophisticated weapons at all requires months of professional training, let alone using them in a mountainous region such as Tora Bora.
The necessity to strengthen ISKP ranks with Pakistani Army professionals and paramilitary is due to the fact that ISKP has had to endure heavy losses while fighting the Taliban as well as Afghan and U.S. forces. This faltering of ISKP forced Pakistan to speed up the process of nurturing its presence, at least along the Durand Line adjacent to the Federally Administered Tribal Areas. It needs to be stressed that Islamic State (ISIS) threat in the shape of ISKP is Pakistan’s main bargaining tool with the region but particularly Russia.
To sum it up, it is not a material connection between ISKP and ISIS that is needed in the Afghanistan-Pakistan context but more the umbrella of ISIS, which the already existing extremist and terror outfits in the region can use a cover for operations. At the same time, the ISKP brand can pave the way for a significant role for the state of Pakistan both in the pro- as well as in the anti-ISIS camps.
The motive for this new regional design remains the same: prolong the conflict in Afghanistan, blackmailing the region and the world to squeeze out concessions and funds to sustain Pakistan’s military-industrial complex. Although ISKP has claimed several attacks in Pakistan, for the past year or so, its primary focus had remained on the area located to the west of the Durand Line: Afghanistan and the Pashtun belt of Pakistan, comprising the Federally Administered Tribal Areas and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Global and regional indifference to this evil in the making will have grave consequences for Afghanistan, western Pakistan, and the rest of the world.
Khyber Sarban served as an adviser in Afghanistan’s Independent Directorate of Local Governance. He can be reached at @khybersarban

Sunday, 13 November 2016

‘Our leaders like a blind rider on a lame horse don’t know where to take it’, Prof A Ghani Bhat

‘Our leaders like a blind rider on a lame horse don’t know where to take it’
Speaking at launch of his autobiography, Prof Bhat calls for ‘light of the vision’ to take struggle
MUDASIR YAQOOB     Srinagar, Publish Date: Nov 11 2016
Striking the first discordant note against the Hurriyat response to the current unrest, former Hurriyat chairman Prof Abdul Gani Bhat today said that leading the freedom struggle calls for a solid strategy than “jumping into river without knowing how to swim”.
He also departed radically from the conventional Hurriyat thinking by calling on all mainstream and separatist parties to “break the walls” and join heads to pressurize India and Pakistan to resolve Kashmir issue. 
"Our leaders are like a blind rider on a lame horse. Horse cannot run and they also don’t know where to take it," he said at the release function of his autobiography ‘Beyond Me’ at his residence in Jawahar Nagar.  “"Our strategy is like jumping into a river.  But before doing so, we don't even pause to think how to cross it". 
He said that the leaders should not only be honest but also sagacious who are clear about the goal, the challenges associated with it and how to lead people there.  
"Those who lead should do so in the light of a deeper and a clear understanding of what is needed to be done. He should possess the light of the vision, the light of the mind which is sharp and penetrating," he said. "In darkness, our heads can collide. We can lose ourselves.  This is why we need leaders who can see and understand what is at stake".
Former Hurriyat chairman also questioned the authority of the “leaders of two-member parties” to decide on behalf of the people of Kashmir. “We have now become a community of leaders. There are now leaders for every two people. We have no common men left among us,” Bhat said in what was seen as a comment at the recent meeting of the Hurriyat with the civil society groups. 
Bhat said that all mainstream and separatist parties should break the walls and join heads and pass a resolution appealing to India and Pakistan to initiate a peaceful and result oriented dialogue viz-a-viz Kashmir issue. 
“People of India and Pakistan also should build pressure on their governments to resolve this issue. People elect governments. An elected government cannot say people to shut mouths. It is people who elect governments. So people are sovereign and supreme powers than the elected governments,” he said, adding, “All parties including PDP, BJP, National Conference, Congress and other leaders of recognized parties are claiming to be well wishers of people of Kashmir. If that is true, why they cannot make collective effort to end the miseries of Kashmiris?” 
“I am not asking them to merge all parties to form one party. They should join heads without disbanding their own parties but only for the resolution of Kashmir issue,” he said. 
He added that collective soul of Kashmiris is wounded. “We are challenging second largest democracy of world. It shows that we have courage and confidence. It can only be done by the people who have sharp minds and understanding.”
He said that one of his Indian friends asked him why people of Kashmir are seeking Azadi when India is filling their pockets and stomach. “I replied to him that India has entered into our pockets and stomach. However, it has failed to enter into the scared chambers of our heart,” he said.
He said that people of Kashmir are well wishers of India, Pakistan and entire South Asia. “India and Pakistan, both are nuclear powers. They cannot go for war. But to end the all dangers and adopt the dialogue that would lead to permanent peace in entire south Asia in the interest of all. We will support and show the both countries the way to move forward,” he said.
He added that water issues between India and Pakistan would turn in dangerous confrontations in next few years, if remain unresolved. 
He said that he was sacked as a professor for speaking truth. “The then authorities thought by their action I would stop speaking truth. But Allah had other plans. After that move of authorities, I rejuvenated Muslim Conference,” he said.
He added that he was sacked on the grounds that “I was threat to the security of state.”
“I was speaking truth that Kashmir issue has to be resolved and India and Pakistan must initiative dialogue to resolve it. Kashmir is issue and this truth was spoken by one of India’s great Prime Ministers Jawahar Lal Nehru and Atal Bihari Vajpayee. UN resolutions, Shimla and Tashkant, are evident of this truth. Everyone in the world can call Kashmir an issue but for a common Kashmir, calling it an issue is a crime,” he said.
He said that India entered into the Kashmir with soar of guns, amid the claim of democracy. “It wounded the souls of Kashmiris. But they remained silent at that time. Nehru was also a Kashmiri. He knew Kashmiris are sharp. So, he made promise in the historical Lal Chowk that people of J&K will express their political will through plebiscite,” he said. 
He added that Lal Chowk has witnessed promises made to people of Kashmir and blood oozing. “We should rename it Istiqlal Chowk,” he said.
He said that India and Pakistan will have to address collective soul of Kashmiris. 
Stressing Indian and Pakistan to devise a mechanism for result oriented talks in respect to the resolution of Kashmir issue, he said that the lingering Kashmir issue has been the main cause of tension and instability in the South Asian region and has led to armed conflicts between India and Pakistan in past causing enormous problems for the smooth and peaceful development of this region.
“We (Kashmiris) would support such a process provided both the countries take into account the aspirations and emotions of Kashmiris,” he said.
He said that America is in Afghanistan and China is in Pakistan. “If these two world’s supreme powers will go for a war, both India and Pakistan will be affected and it will have also adverse affect on Kashmir issue,” he said.
“My book Beyond Me is a confession of things which I couldn’t do but were doable. It is about the events upto 1986,” he said.


Saturday, 12 November 2016

My open letter to ISI, Dr Shabir Choudhry

My open letter to ISI, Dr Shabir Choudhry
London         12 November 2016

Some people promote your secret agency, as world’s number one secret agency; also very brave and efficient. I wonder if that is true

Your allegation is that on instructions of India I am sabotaging CPEC; and that is why you have instructed NADRA not to renew my NICOP – ID card, which is essentially evidence of existence of the card holder; and without it one cannot function in Pakistan and in Pakistani occupied territories of Jammu and Kashmir State.

I examined role of the ISI in my article written on 23 May 2011 with the following title:  ISI is the best secret agency, is it? I am providing you a link to that article, in case you have not read it. Just to remind you that at that time there was no CPEC, hence, no alleged instructions from any quarter to write about your role.

By blocking renewal of my ID card, you successfully deprived me to accompany dead body of my father and take part in his funeral and burial. On 15 June 2015, I applied for renewal of my card and my father died on 29 August 2015 in England, and his body was taken back to our village in Pakistani occupied Kashmir in District Bhimber.

On 29 August 2016, as a devout Muslims belonging to Hanfi Fiq we arranged annual Khatem for my beloved father, where we invited hundreds of other Muslims of the area to recite holy Quran and Darood Paak; and seek forgiveness of Allah SWT. Again thanks to your great work, I was unable to take part in this function and visit grave of my beloved father. On this great achievement you should feel proud and ask the government to give you an achievement medal.

Do you think by doing all this you have won my mind and heart, and have generated goodwill? No. You have generated more anger and resentment against you; and I feel I need to work harder to expose your imperial designs on my motherland where you will always be seen as an occupier. How would you feel if your father dies and you are restricted to take part in his funeral and burial?

We read papers that in Pakistan, hate preachers, terrorists and those who kill police and army men generously get passports and NADRA cards; and that is not anti Pakistan. My ID card is blocked because I am not hate preacher; I am not a terrorist and I am not a killer. This policy will haunt you for many years.

Your bravery
One can see your bravery and ruthlessness from the above and the following. You know I am not a violent or an aggressive person. I don’t carry gun or any kind of weapon with me; despite this you want to curb my right to travel and right to visit my home village and meet my relatives and friends because you are afraid of me. You are afraid of my pen. You are afraid of my communication skills.

Is it not shameful to your ‘brave and best agency’ to be afraid of 63 years old man with serious health issues; and who is in high risk category? I have endured two heart attacks. I have five stents in my arteries. My left lung is 80% not working. I suffer from sever and consistent attacks of Vertigo, which makes it difficult to control my body balance. I have a hole in my left eardrum, and also I have blood pressure.

Do you feel proud that you have restricted movements of a person with multiple health issues, and who wanted to go back to his village and spend retirement there? Before your great work of blocking issuance of my ID card, I was seriously considering to end my political activities because my health was and is deteriorating. I had problems even walking 100 yards; or walk to my bedroom on first floor. But thanks to your actions I had to continue my work, as I didn’t want to give you this pleasure that by your one move Dr Shabir Choudhry has surrendered.

Your allegations
Thinking people of Jammu and Kashmir and Pakistan know authenticity of your illogical and fake allegations which depicts sick mentality. These absurd allegations don’t merit a reply. It is part of Pakistani political culture to accuse political opponents of being ‘anti state’, or ‘agent’ of someone, especially ‘agent of India’. No one needs any evidence to level this allegation, all one needs is a big mouth, misplaced loyalty and fractured conscience.

It is part of Pakistani culture of your country to accuse political opponents of being anti state, agents of India, America, Russia and Jews etc; and accuse religious opponents as kaffirs? Just look at the following leaders and tags they have:
1.      Wasn’t Fatima Jinnah, sister of Mohammed Ali Jinnah accused of being an Indian agent?

2.      Isn’t Nawaz Sharif, three times elected Prime Minister of Pakistan, accused of being an Indian agent?

3.      Isn’t Imran Khan accused of being a Jewish agent?

4.      Isn’t Dr Tahir Ul Qadri accused of being a Canadian and an American agent?

5.      Furthermore, both of these are accused to have met in India to plan infamous dharnas, which in a way, make them Indian agents?

6.      Wasn’t General Musharaf accused of being an American agent?

7.      Don’t Generals like Kiani, Pasha, Ayub Khan, Zia Ul Haq and many others carry tags as being American agents?

8.      Wasn’t late Benazir Bhutto declared as a security risk?
There is a long list of people who were accused of being agents of someone. After reading this, do you feel any remorse; or is that too much to expect?

I am a Kashmiri patriot
I am not a Pakistani; and article 257 of Constitution acknowledges this fact. I don’t have to express loyalty to those who occupy my country. I am a loyal citizen of State of Jammu and Kashmir. I strongly feel that the entire state of Jammu and Kashmir should emerge as an impendent country. Throughout my adult life I have worked for this cause; and by grace of Allah SWT, to date, I have not done anything to harm my cause.

Yes, I criticise those who occupy my country; and I have every right to do that. I criticise foot soldiers of the occupiers who work against interests of united and independent Jammu and Kashmir.

I have authored more than 57 books and booklets on Jammu and Kashmir, and India Pakistan relations. I challenge my critics to find me a paragraph where I have expressed my desire to be part of India; even though, thanks to Pakistan we people of Jammu and Kashmir have only two choices: become a Pakistani or an Indian. Find me a paragraph or a sentence where I have said the areas of Jammu and Kashmir under India are not disputed. To me and my colleagues the entire State of Jammu and Kashmir is disputed; and our struggle is for unification and independence of the State that existed on 16 August 1947.

 Hypocrisy of Pakistani officials is that they have left us with only two choices – join India or Pakistan; and if people express their desire to become part of India – a right given to them by Pakistan and the UN, then they accuse them of being traitor, unpatriotic and anti Pakistan.

You people are angry because of my research and hard work I have systematically exposed Pakistan’s hypocrisy and double standards on Jammu and Kashmir. I have also exposed their imperial designs and systematic exploitation of our resources.
As a loyal son of the soil it is my duty to use my knowledge and experience to promote and safeguard interest of people of State of Jammu and Kashmir.

I know you have created lakhs of mental slaves in Jammu and Kashmir and in Gilgit Baltistan to serve your interests. Let me tell you, I need no certificate of patriotism from you. My dream to retire and spend last years of my life in my home village is shattered because of your unwise and unwarranted actions.

What you are doing with regard to renewal of my NADRA card is legally 100% incorrect. You have gone a step further, and refused to renew NADRA card of my daughter who has nothing to do with politics. She is married and lives with her husband and children separately. She is a practising lawyer and a law abiding citizen. Under the UNCIP Resolutions you are obliged to protect our political and social rights, and not curb them.

I did not want this war with you; but you have imposed this war on me. This should be a war of all citizens of Jammu and Kashmir who want an independent Jammu and Kashmir. I have two options, either surrender to you because you are too powerful, or fight back. I have decided not to surrender. I may not win, but I will prove to you that all citizens of Jammu and Kashmir are not mental slaves or cowherds; and above all we are not for sale.

By taking this choice I know I could be eliminated like Saleem Shehzad or Arif Shahid. Despite that, I will fight back your imperialism and arrogance, because my desire to see you exposed is stronger than my desire to live


Writer is a political analyst, TV anchor and author of many books and booklets. Also he is Director Institute of Kashmir Affairs; Chairman South Asia Watch.  Email:drshabirchoudhry@gmail.com   

Sunday, 6 November 2016

Gen Raheel Sharif plans judicial coup against Nawaz

Gen Raheel Sharif plans judicial coup against Nawaz
Analysts in key countries who are engaged in tracking developments in Pakistan warn that GHQ Rawalpindi has initiated a plan to remove Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif before the middle of 2017. Instead of a Musharraf-style military coup, this time around the planning is for the Pakistan Supreme Court to perform the (not very difficult) task of finding Nawaz Sharif guilty of corruption and initiating his prosecution. The grounds given will be the Panama Papers revelations, along with fresh evidence against the Pakistan Prime Minister that has been gathered by GHQ Rawalpindi, including undeclared assets in the United States and Canada. Contrary to those in India who claim that Sharif is insincere about wanting peaceful relations with India, and indeed in contrast to his own fiery rhetoric on Kashmir, these experts say that Sharif has sought to work out a peace agreement with Prime Minister Narendra Modi, on the principle that “only hawks can ensure a peace settlement”.
 They say that PM Modi’s gesture of dropping in on the Sharif family for a birthday celebration towards the close of last year “made a big impact on the entire (Sharif) family”, who “saw in Modi a man who could be expected to keep his side of the bargain” in contrast to Manmohan Singh. The 2004-14 Prime Minister is blamed by high-level circles in Islamabad for “making promises which subsequently get forgotten” and in not “walking the talk” on the several secret and overt peace overtures made to Pakistan during the UPA period, including the “Musharraf Formula” of soft borders between the parts of Kashmir held by the two sides, a solution that would allow the migration of several hundred thousand Pashto and Punjabi-speaking settlers across Jammu & Kashmir, thereby strengthening the influence of GHQ Rawalpindi in all corners of the state.

According to these sources, the reason why GHQ seeks to oust Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif is that “he is not in favour of an aggressive and adventurous line to match the Modi government’s newfound assertiveness on the Line of Control (LoC)”. Aware of the harmful consequences of any such escalation on the business environment in Pakistan, Sharif is known to have argued against General Raheel Sharif’s call for a “matching response” to recent Indian moves, including the surgical strike on terror camps which took place last month. The Pakistan Prime Minister is known to be against giving an extension to the present Chief of Army Staff, and is seeking to replace him with a Corps Commander “who is junior to at least two other serving generals in the (Pakistan) army”, besides of course General Sharif himself. A key source revealed that “initially the view within the higher command of the Pakistan army was to make the extension of service of the present chief a matter of prestige”, but in September, a Plan B was adopted. This would involve a fresh election in Pakistan, where General Raheel Sharif would take over as the leader of a coalition of parties that would act as a “Third Front” separate from both the PML(Nawaz) and the Zardari-run PPP. The expectation is that the popularity of the present army chief would be sufficient to ensure that this coalition gets a majority in Parliament, especially as there would be a division of votes between the PPP and the PML(N). According to the analysts talked to, GHQ Rawalpindi “has dossiers on every top leader of both the main parties”, and “these would be selectively leaked during the campaign” to contrast them with Raheel Sharif, who has a reputation for integrity. 

These sources claim that Imran Khan’s latest agitation was scripted by GHQ to ensure that the Pakistan Supreme Court took up the matter of Nawaz Sharif’s corruption, thus setting into motion the chain of events expected to end in his downfall. They claim that Imran Khan has reached an understanding with the military to accept the leadership of Raheel Sharif in a future coalition government, in which he would be the Foreign Minister. It may be mentioned that Raheel Sharif has very close contact with both the US and China, and has recently built bridges with Moscow on the recommendation of China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA). Over the past four years, China has ensured that the Pakistan military retains its strike capability against India, “as the PLA wants to launch a second front, should India join the US and Japan in entering into a conflict with China over the East or South China Sea or over North Korea or Taiwan”. According to the sources spoken to, “Raheel Sharif has promised to open a second front in the event of hostilities between India and China”, despite the fact that such a reciprocal gesture has not been made by Beijing during any of Pakistan’s wars with India. 

A high-level source claimed that “while Raheel Sharif is trusted in Beijing, Nawaz Sharif is not”, thereby implying that Pakistan’s closest ally would have no problem were the present Prime Minister of Pakistan replaced by the Chief of Army Staff, “especially if such a change were to occur through the ballot box”. China is in the process of supplying fifth-generation fighter aircraft to the Pakistan air force “as soon as two squadrons of fourth-generation Rafale aircraft get inducted into the Indian Air Force. Beijing is already co-producing J17 aircraft with Pakistan, and has gifted that country’s navy eight diesel submarines to counter the Indian fleet. Interestingly, General Raheel Sharif has managed to persuade Russia to supply Mi-35 helicopters, using the excuse that these were intended for counter-terror operations in FATA and in parts of Balochistan. Interestingly, together with the move of the military in Pakistan to remove the PM, terrorists from the Lashkar-e-Tayyaba, Jamat-ud-Dawa and Jaish-e-Mohammad are openly congregating in cities across Pakistan, even though these are wanted by both the US as well as India. 

Once a new government linked to the Pakistan military gets formed in Islamabad, the intention is to ramp up the “internal insurgency” in Kashmir. In this context, GHQ claims that four districts in south Kashmir have become no-go-zones for police, with those in uniform still present “being rendered frightened and ineffective” by pro-Pakistan groups. GHQ Rawalpindi has asked its men in Kashmir to get hold of police weapons, “so that innocent people can be shot and the police blamed”. More than a hundred such weapons have already been seized by pro-Pakistan elements from the police, “with around two dozen having been handed over voluntarily by police personnel” close to such elements. 

The intent of GHQ Rawalpindi is to “ensure that future acts of violence get perpetrated entirely by home grown terrorists” and not by imports from across the border. In this context, “the effort to make Burhan Wani a heroic martyr is intended to tempt many more such impressionable youth into joining the groups planning to launch a wave of insurgent attacks in Kashmir around the time Nawaz Sharif is removed in Islamabad”. “Along with responding through conventional actions such as sniper fire and rocket shelling from across the LoC, the plan is to intensify terror operations across India and create a climate of insurgency in Kashmir”, claimed an analyst based in the US. These sources say that GHQ Rawalpindi “does not share the feelings of Nawaz Sharif for (PM) Modi, and hence wants to replace him with a substitute who would be supportive of a policy of robust move across the LoC and through proxies the rest of Kashmir”. 
According to them, the present Prime Minister of Pakistan is “counting the days before he is removed from office by the judiciary”.


One, two, three - from Mumbai to Pathankot to Uri, the future is being written for us. CYRIL ALMEIDA

One, two, three - from Mumbai to Pathankot to Uri, the future is being written for us. CYRIL ALMEIDA 
ULTIMATELY, they’re going to have to do it. They know it, we know it and the targets do too: decommission the favourites; defang the good ones.
Get rid of militancy.
Think of it as an arc: from Musharraf to Kayani to Raheel to the next chief, a progressive clampdown against groups that had to be taken on.
With Musharraf, it was Al Qaeda — 9/11 changed the world and the world changed how we did business.
From Kayani to Raheel, a second purge — the anti-Pakistan lot. They came after us, so we had to go after them.
And soon the next chief — confronted with the spectre of a roiling Kashmir and the long-term presence of a right-winger in Delhi causing the last line standing to go into agitated motion.
Something will have to be done before they do us in.
One, two, three — is there an arc of inevitability to it? Each successive chief having to go incrementally further than the last, not necessarily because he wanted to, but because he had to.
Lost in the warfare of the last month was an important consensus: the civilians said something needed to be done and the boys agreed — though, tellingly, the civilians resisted other actions in Punjab.
But the path to recognising that something has to be done about the anti-India lot has begun to be trodden.
It is the logic of utility, institutional self-preservation and the mechanism of jihad: if the groups exist, they occasionally have to go into action; and when they do, the outside world has a reaction.
Uri was perhaps the least significant and so the reaction the most telling. Pathankot was really the bigger deal, but it came a week after Modi’s Christmas Day Lahore surprise.
He couldn’t react as angrily because he had just pushed open the door to normalisation. So India swallowed its rage and the world kept quiet.
When Uri happened, there was no such luck. India went into a rage and the world sympathised, even before the facts were known.
On India, we don’t have the advantage we have with the Afghan-centric lot. There we can always nudge them across the border — go home to where you belong, we can tell them when the time comes.
With the anti-India lot, this is home. They’re from here and this is where the fallout will be suffered.
And so this is where they’ll have to be dealt with.
The past offers some clues about what the future could look like. With Al Qaeda there was an opening wallop followed by sustained action.
The wallop came because 9/11 was momentous. It is how history will be measured, time before 9/11 and time after.
The sustained, years-long pursuit of Al Qaeda, in Fata and the cities, came because America insisted and America had the resources to make sure we listened.
But then came the Osama anomaly — what the hell was he doing here for those long years in plain sight?
The lesson: we’re like the kid who hates homework. We’ll make a show of it in the beginning and then find reason to go slow or switch off.
Phase three, the push against the anti-India lot, will be a root canal — when we get around to it, we sure won’t like it and will find plenty of reason not to until it threatens to kill us.
From the push against the anti-Pakistan lot, a different lesson: the need to create a national narrative first, the fabled public consensus that the boys demand as the starting point.
The boys have already hinted at it in private: telling the civilians to get a parliamentary resolution; arguing that public opinion needs to be kept onside; cautioning against moving too fast and under a perception of Indian pressure.
It can seem a ruse and a delaying mechanism, but the experience of getting to the point of saying no more on the anti-Pakistan lot is mirroring the talking points on the anti-India lot — the boys won’t do it until they’re sure they have the public onside.
But let’s not kid ourselves — the anti-India lot are fundamentally a different challenge.
It’s not like that they’re hard to find — their power is derived from the ability to thrive in plain sight. When we do decide to go after them, the core networks can be shut down relatively quickly.
The challenge, then, is something else: separating them from the anti-India narrative.
We’ll have to find a way to shut down the anti-India lot without tampering with the story of India being Enemy No 1.
Because, as has become evident, India being Enemy No 1 is an unalterable truth, an inalienable position that the boys will never give up.
The logic of utility, institutional self-preservation and the mechanism of jihad means the boys can and will turn on the anti-India lot. What the boys will never do is give up on India being the enemy.
So how to do it? And can it happen as soon as the next chief?
It won’t happen when India is demanding furiously — this much we can see. And it won’t happen when the civilians try to make themselves look good.
But it can if — if — someone can figure out how to get the boys to do it without making it look like it was someone else’s idea and without the boys looking bad.
One, two, three — at least the logic is in place.
The writer is a member of staff.
Twitter: @cyalm
Published in Dawn, November 6th, 2016