Wednesday, 20 May 2020

The fast pace of dual - colonisation of Gilgit-Baltistan

The fast pace of dual - colonisation of Gilgit-Baltistan
By Dr Amjad Ayub Mirza Glasgow [Scotland], May 18 (ANI):
Pakistan occupied Gilgit-Baltistan (PoGB) is undergoing unconstitutional and illegal political and economic enslavement under the guise of political sovereignty and economic development.
On May 15, the president of Pakistan Arif Alvi has finally signed the 2020 Amendment Order which modifies Article 56 (Section 5) extending the jurisdiction of the Election Act of Pakistan to PoGB permitting it to conduct a general election and set up an interim government in the occupied territory.
There was no such clause in the previous Gilgit-Baltistan Order 2018 that would allow the creation of an interim government prior to a general election in GB.
The tenure of the current Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz) government will come to an end on June 26.
Pakistan has no legal authority to directly interfere in PoGB. According to United Nations resolutions, Gilgit-Baltistan is declared a disputed area and it has asked Pakistan to withdraw its troops from the region.
The decision of the government of Pakistan to set up an interim government in PoGB and to conduct general elections under the guidelines of the Election Commission of Pakistan is a serious breach of the UN resolution and therefore must be challenged by Indian representative at the United Nations.
On May 13, China's state-owned Construction Company signed a deal with Frontier Works Organisation, the commercial arm of the Pakistan army, to start the construction of the Diamer-Bhasha dam on River Indus.
According to the figures released the total cost of the dam will be Rs 442 billion (approximately 280 billion Indian rupees). It is expected to be completed by 2028 and will produce 4500 megawatts of electricity.
The project is being funded by public sector development funds and commercial loans.
China has a stake of a whopping 70 per cent and Pakistan a meagre 30 per cent. Details of the interest rates at which commercial loans will be obtained have not been revealed and a slight fluctuation in the interest rate could send the construction cost through the roof.
Again, Pakistan has no right to build a dam on PoGB soil, which is actually Indian Territory under the illegal occupation of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.
The construction of Diamer-Bhasha Dam will cause enormous environmental destruction including the devastation of the city of Chillas. Furthermore, it will deprive the agricultural lands in Sindh, in Southern Pakistan, of the much-needed irrigation water causing thousands to starve to death due to famine.
On May 15, the Awami Action Committee (AWC), a social rights campaign group, warned that any attempt to introduce the Land Reform Act in PoGB will not be acceptable.
In an interview given on the basis of anonymity, a senior official working in the planning department in Islamabad told this scribe that a new Land Reform Bill is expected to be presented to the PoGB assembly for approval probably before the assembly is dissolved on June 26.
He said that if the Land Reform Bill is passed and becomes an Act then there will be no obstacle in the way of Pakistani State and its military to grab as many mineral-rich mountains, forests land, pastures and barren as well as fertile lands of POGB as they please.
He warned that such an Act would deprive every PoGB citizen of any land rights, as the State of Pakistan will procure them. Furthermore, it will propose to replace the name of Khalsa Sarkar with Government Lands Commission or Pakistan Government Lands Department. Thus giving an impression that the century-old Dogra legacy that protected the land rights of the indigenous people is finally over.
The official said that all barren land would then be procured for administrative and military purposes.
The lands rich in mineral resources and precious stone will be brought under the legal ownership of Pakistan mining and industry department and then could be leased out to private contractors (mostly military and big bureaucrats). He disclosed that thousands of acres of land are to be acquired by the government and sold to private builders who are anxious to build housing colonies for the rich.
The land alongside Karakorum highway will also be procured by the state only to be transferred to the private sector for exploiting it to make mega-profits. The official said that thousands of acres of land would also be grabbed to build Defence Housing Societies and corporate hotels depriving the local population of any chance to own a house.
Plans to upgrade Skardu airport is also now underway and this has raised a few eyebrows. What could be the real purpose of such an upgrade? Most likely it will serve a dual purpose as a commercial airport as well as a military base for China to guarantee protection for the uninterrupted construction of the China Pakistan Economic Corridor and related projects, but the true nature of such an exercise could well be to target India.
Today the people of PoGB live under the dual colonised terror of Pakistan and China. For how long are these mountain people to suffer? Let us never forget that the people of PoGB and PoJK live in Indian territories that have been illegally occupied through a war of aggression waged by the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.
[Disclaimer: Dr Amjad Ayub Mirza is an author and human rights activist from Mirpur in PoJK. He currently lives in exile in UK.] (ANI)

Monday, 18 May 2020

Is CPEC Economic Corridor or a Strategic Game Plan? Dr Shabir Choudhry

Is CPEC Economic Corridor or a Strategic Game Plan? Dr Shabir Choudhry


Pakistani state, intelligence services, some Pakistani leaders and blind followers of leaders are presenting the China Pakistan Economic Corridor as a holy cow which must be respected if not worshiped. No one is allowed to criticise or oppose the CPEC. Those who dare to criticise it are suffering. Some are facing sedition charges and others were abducted, punished and dumped. Some others are threatened, harassed and intimidated. Our opposition to the CPEC is not because of economic development, but because of its hidden agenda; and how it will affect geo politics and environment of the entire region. Moreover, how it will damage Pakistan and its economy, culture and Islamic ethos.

Thursday, 14 May 2020

Why 22 October matters in history of Jammu and Kashmir, Dr Shabir Choudhry

Why 22 October matters in history of Jammu and Kashmir, Dr Shabir Choudhry
Pakistani backed Tribal attack root cause of our problems.

'Liberation Struggle, Jihad or a Proxy War', Dr Shabir Choudhry

'Liberation Struggle, Jihad or a Proxy War', Dr Shabir Choudhry

New round of militancy in Kashmir started in July 1988. Some people call it ‘Liberation struggle’, but others call it Jihad. Some others call it a proxy war. This is also called terrorism. No matter what you call the on- going militancy, it has caused enormous problems for people of Jammu and Kashmir, especially people of the Kashmir Valley; and it has resulted in death of tens of thousands of people, imprisonment, rapes, custodial deaths, kidnappings, destruction of property and other forms of human rights violations. 

Wednesday, 13 May 2020

Was Sheikh Abdullah a hero or a villain? Who decides that, Pakistan or people of Jammu and Kashmir?

Was Sheikh Abdullah a hero or a villain? Who decides that, Pakistan or people of Jammu and Kashmir?

https://www.academia.edu/43029022/Sheikh_Abdullah_Kashmiri_hero_or_villain

Tuesday, 12 May 2020

Read PDF copy of my book, 'Why Arif Shahid was killed.'

Read PDF copy of my book, 'Why Arif Shahid was killed.'

This book was banned by Pakistan, and created enormous problems for all those who had anything to do with publication of this book.

https://www.academia.edu/43026446/Why_Arif_Shahid_was_killed_Pakistani_attempts_to_silence_dissent_exposed

Monday, 11 May 2020

A letter to Labour Party Leader Keir Starmer on Jammu and Kashmir dispute.

A letter to Labour Party Leader Keir Starmer on Jammu and Kashmir dispute.               
United  Kashmir  People's National Party(UKPNP)

Date:   10 May 2020                                                              

Dear Keir Starmer MP
Leader of the Opposition
House of Commons
London SW1A OAA

Dear Keir Starmer

Re: Jammu and Kashmir dispute

I am a British citizen, and have lived here peacefully since 1966; and strongly wish that peace and stability prevails in Britain that we can all live here peacefully.

On behalf of United Kashmir Peoples National Party, which strongly believes in democratic, liberal and secular ideals; and have actively advanced a peaceful solution of the Jammu and Kashmir dispute, I want to make the following points.

Please note that Jammu and Kashmir dispute is not a territorial dispute between India and Pakistan.

Whereas India and Pakistan are party to the Jammu and Kashmir  dispute, we people of Jammu and Kashmir are the principal party – a party which has continued to suffer since October 1947 on both sides of the divide.

In your letter to Muslim Council of Britain, dated 08 May 2020, you stated:

‘Our position on Kashmir has not changed, we support and recognise previous UN resolutions on the right of Kashmir people but maintain that if we are to find a lasting settlement to end this conflict, that can only be achieved if India and Pakistan working together, with the people of Kashmir.’

May I remind you that the UN Security Resolution of 13 August 1948 stated:
A. (1) ‘As the presence of troops of Pakistan in the territory of the State of Jammu and Kashmir constitutes a material change in the situation since it was represented by the Government of Pakistan before the Security Council, the Government of Pakistan agrees to withdraw its troops from that State.

(2) The Government of Pakistan will use its best endeavour to secure the withdrawal from the State of Jammu and Kashmir of tribesmen and Pakistan nationals not normally resident therein who have entered the State for the purpose of fighting.’

Pakistan to date has not withdrawn their troops from the territories that do not belong to Pakistan, but continues to send ‘Jihadi warriors’ to commit acts of violence and terrorism on the other side of the divide.

In view of this bitter fact, how relevant are the UN Resolutions, especially when both India and Pakistan have agreed in the Simla Agreement of 1972, that they will resolve the dispute bilaterally.

There seems to be no role for the divided people of Jammu and Kashmir. It is our homeland which is forcibly divided and we must have a final say to determine future status of our motherland.

I hope the Labour Party under your leadership will play its role in empowering people of Jammu and Kashmir, and in this regard, the Pakistani withdrawal is prerequisite. Only after that, appropriate arrangements could be made where people of Jammu and Kashmir can determine future status of Jammu and Kashmir.

Also, I hope that the Labour Party, under your leadership, will ensure that Members of Parliament do not succumb to pressure of those who promote extremism, intolerance and religious hatred; and will discharge their duties impartially by taking views of all communities in to consideration.

It is sad to note that some Members of Parliament , while dealing with Jammu and Kashmir dispute, behave in a manner as if they were spokespersons of Pakistan. This attitude not only damages the standing of the Labour Party, but also harms the Jammu and Kashmir dispute, as they try to make it a religious dispute.

While promoting peace and stability in South Asia, we must ensure that there is peace and harmony in Britain, and no one should be permitted to stir up religious and ethnic discord.

We wish to meet you or someone else who deals with matters of South Asia that we can discuss some of the issues mentioned above.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Your sincerely



Dr Shabir Choudhry
President Foreign Affairs Committee of UKPNP.
Email: drshabirchoudhry@gmail.com      Tel:07790942471