China’s Growing Interest in Gilgit Baltistan,
Senge Sering
Senge Sering, President of Institute for Gilgit Baltistan
Studies
July 16, 2013 3:07 pm
July 16, 2013 3:07 pm
Recent agreements between China and Pakistan during
the visit of Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif to Beijing on July 4 reflect
China’s growing interest in Gilgit-Baltistan and Balochistan.
One must greatly admire China for
making optimal use of geography to promote her economic and strategic
interests. Instead of conquering lands, China decided to befriend her South
Asian neighbors and this interdependence resulting from economic and security
partnerships, is often claimed as a diplomatic victory.
The situation allows China to obtain
the natural resources required to sustain its economic and industrial growth,
and extend her sphere of influence to deny the potential adversaries strategic
depth in the region. In short, China has achieved with friendship what the USSR
failed to do by force and gained comfortable access to the warm waters of the
Indian Ocean. Today many of the South Asian neighbors have become a point of
reference and transit route for China to enhance her influence in the Middle
East, the Persian Gulf and Africa.
However, China’s present relationship
with South Asian neighbors is entirely different compared to when the
communists initially took control of the country. For instance, the intrusion
into Tibet and Gilgit-Baltistan; border skirmishes with Pakistan; suspension of
diplomatic relations with Nepal; land disputes with Bhutan and India; and the
refusal to recognize Bangladesh and blocking its bid for UN membership were
some of the incidents reflecting on the volatile political situation of that
era.
It was after the Sino-India War and
the subsequent Indo-Soviet agreement that China accepted Pakistan’s offer to
establish the strategic partnership.
Following
the ancient Chinese proverb,
“To Get Rich, One Must Build Roads,” the communist regime has since focused on
improving road connectivity with the southern neighbors. Recent agreements
between China and Pakistan during the visit of Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz
Sharif to Beijing on July 4 reflect China’s growing interest in
Gilgit-Baltistan and Balochistan. China will spend approximately US $18 billion
to construct tunnels through the mountains of Gilgit-Baltistan which will
enhance her strategic and economic capability and quick access to Pakistani and
Iranian ports.
The developments have helped enhance
regional trade as well as giving China access to mineral wealth in those
countries. Today, many of these countries are seeking China’s human, financial,
and technological assistance in developing ports, naval bases, military and
nuclear installations, civilian industrial development, hydropower, and
information and telecom facilities.
Despite the lingering border dispute,
Indo-China trade has surpassed the seventy billion dollar mark. This shows that
China didn’t choose to keep her people hostage to border disputes and adopted
liberal trade relations with her rivals; an economic model that Pakistan and
India could also replicate to help eradicate poverty in their own countries.
China’s development projects have provided benefits
to hundreds of thousands of people
However, such ventures also lead to
human rights violations in the host countries and complicate the life of the
indigenous and minority people in the affected regions by undermining their
decision-making right over resource management and revenue sharing.
The indigenous communities expect
both Chinese and their host governments to review the policies that adversely
impact their ethnic and religious demography, sustainable livelihoods and
weaken the centuries-old connection with their land and resources.
China’s development model has left a
longer lasting mark on the indigenous cultural identities. Dam building and
resource extraction has hurt the ecosystem and climate, which should remain
under scrutiny of international rights and environmental organizations. Showing
more respect to human rights, challenging the culture of impunity and enhancing
accountability can help attain a balance in developmental goals, protecting
indigenous rights and mitigating environmental concerns.
Senge
H. Sering is the President of Institute
for Gilgit Baltistan Studies and hails from a Tibetan speaking region called
Baltistan (Baltiyul), which has been declared a disputed area between India and
Pakistan by the United Nations. There are about 600,000 Balti people residing
in India and Pakistan who profess Islam and speak archaic Tibetan. Read other articles by Senge.
You
may also like -
No comments:
Post a Comment