Tuesday, 1 December 2020

Pakistan Buying Mini Drones From Turkey To Bolster Its Border Offensive Against India

 Pakistan Buying Mini Drones From Turkey To Bolster Its Border Offensive Against India

 November 29, 2020

 

To enhance surveillance on the border and fast-track weapons dispatches on the Indian side of Kashmir, Pakistan is roping in Turkey to provide it with high-tech mini UAVs, reports India’s Times Now channel recently reported.

 

According to the report, the Islamic nation is negotiating a deal to buy small drones from multiple Turkish companies to bolster its UAV fleet for deployment on the border with India.

 

The Indian security forces recently shot down a drone in the Kathua region of Jammu and Kashmir, with reports of more drone shootings in recent months by the Indian army. Pakistan is, therefore, hunting for more drones, especially mini-UAVs, to up its game against India.

 

With Turkish drones gaining worldwide popularity for their battle performances, as demonstrated in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, and the wars in Syria and Libya, Pakistan is reportedly planning to profit from its closest ally’s autonomous assets. 

 

The reports in the Indian media also talked about Pakistan conducting trials in early September this year for the S-250 mini UAV at its 506 UAV base workshop. Subsequently, more trials were held in the 12 Infantry Division area from 8th to 18th September.

 

The S-250 is considered an ideal drone for effective monitoring of a designated area at any time of the day, ensuring the security of assets, detecting acts of unauthorized activity in areas of responsibility. Despite its small size, it can fly for up to 3 hours, with a video transmission range up to 25 km, and a control range of up to 50-70 km.

 

The Pakistan army has been looking for mini UAVs, which can stay for several hours in the air, to monitor the border, with a preferable range of 150 km. The trails S-350 UAV and there have been trials at Gwadar, Muzaffarabad, and Turbat, in Balochistan. It can be in the air for over four hours and has a range of 280 km.

 

The unmanned aerial vehicle S-350 is designed for panoramic and planimetric aerial photography and video shooting and other similar tasks. Its modular architecture allows for quick and efficient changes of UAV payloads and aircraft equipment variations.

The sealed design of the control system module and payload considerably prolongs the service life of the costly equipment under regular operation.

 

Pakistan has also been negotiating to buy advanced drones from Turkish companies, such as Bogazici Savunma, a Turkish firm, for the ILTER drone detection and neutralization systems.

 

The ILTER Drone Detection and Prevention System is the latest feature in today’s drones, with automatic detection, stopping and deception features against drones using ISM bands while communicating remotely.

 

Turkey is becoming a hub of modern drone technologies and has exported its armed drones to many countries in recent years. The Turkish drones used in the recent Nagorno-Karabakh war helped Azerbaijan claim a decisive victory over Armenia, and Pakistan is aiming to bolster its offensive capabilities by incorporating the country’s newly acquired edge.

 

Pakistan has a dire need for advanced drones as it is fighting a proxy war in the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir, where the UAVs can be used for dropping weapons and surveilling the target areas. The Pakistan army has used drones to supply AK-47s to the militants on the Indian side of the border multiple times in recent years.

 

Besides, during the frequent border skirmishes, the army will need to keep an eye on the weapons and human targets on the other side of the border without exposing itself, which is why drone warfare will become the order of the day in the near future.

 

https://eurasiantimes.com/pakistan-buying-mini-drones-from-turkey-to-bolster-its-border-offensive-against-india-reports/


Friday, 27 November 2020

The Taliban are Betraying Trump's Peace Deal

Tuesday, 24 November 2020

Should Pakistan recognise Israel?

Should Pakistan recognise Israel? Dr Shabir Choudhry June 2003 

(I wrote this as a report on a request of the Foreign Ministry of Pakistan in February 1999. Later on, I made changes to the report and published it as an article in June 2003. Many people will find it interesting, but foot soldiers may have a different view.) 

President Mushharaf’s visit to Camp David has started more than one controversy and his alleged ‘sell out’ on Kashmir and on other issues including doing a deal on the recognition of Israel. His invitation to Camp David was important and will have a far reaching impact on the politics of South Asia and the Middle East. It is believed that President Musharraf, if he plays his cards correctly and wisely, will play a major role in years to come. 

We people of Kashmir and people of Pakistan might not like everything he is asked to do, and everything he has pledged to do; but he and his close colleagues think they know better and that they are doing everything in the best interest of Pakistan and Muslims. 

As a writer and a student of history, with strong feelings on the issue of Kashmir, I do not agree with many things he is doing, especially related to Kashmir; nor I agree with Kashmir policy of any of his predecessors. But as far as his policy on the issue of Israel and controlling and containing the threat of extremism and fanaticism is concerned, he has my full backing. 

Many people give in to emotional feelings when they talk of Kashmir and Israel. And any decision clouded by emotional feelings could have serious consequences, therefore it is prudent for all concerned to look at the ground realities, and take decisions with political maturity and demands of the 21st century in mind. 

On the issue of recognition of Israel I wrote the following article about three years ago, and I think under the present debate, it still has some valid points; hence I am presenting the article as it was written at that time. Dr Shabir Choudhry 

Careful study of relationships between various countries indicates one solid rule in international relations: A country’s foreign policy is determined by its national interest. 

The above rule is applied everywhere in the world, and this is why there are no permanent friends or foes in international politics. Today’s friends could well be tomorrow’s adversaries.

When one analyses Pakistan’s foreign policy, it becomes clear that Pakistan’s foreign policy does not follow the above internationally recognised rule. One notes that Pakistan’ foreign policy is too slow to change to meet the requirements of constantly changing world politics, hence Pakistan’s national interest is compromised. This is because Pakistan’s, foreign policy is dominated by emotions, traditions, and too much reliance on ‘friends’, not appreciating the above rule, that there are no permanent friends in world politics. 

The aim of this short article is not to analyse the entire foreign policy of Pakistan but to explain that Pakistan needs to make certain much required changes to its foreign policy. Nation states can choose friends but cannot choose its neighbours. So it is imperative to have a friendly and cordial relationship with them. I don’t need to explain what Pakistan has lost as a result of bad relationships with India, Russia (USSR) and Afghanistan. Pakistan must have good relations with its neighbours in order to reap full benefits. 

Pakistan’s foreign policy is full of blunders, and one such blunder, is to win the animosity of Israel and worse still to perpetuate it. And without doubt Pakistan has lost more from this. Today’s world politics is controlled and directed by international capitalism, and we all know that Jews dominate all these institutions. Is it prudent to continue this policy when Pakistan is at the mercy of these institutions? Some statistics to support the above point: 

• We very much rely on the American support in every walk of life. There are 83 top brains, which control and direct American political, social, economic and military policies, and 45 of them are Jews. More than half of the remaining 38 have direct influence over them. The remaining has indirect influence or they could be cajoled to adopt a particular line. 

• There are 600 multi - national companies, which control International Capitalism. Jews own Three hundred of these, whereas Jews control 420 of them. The remaining multi nationals could be persuaded to take a specific line on certain matters. 

• Many would say Pakistan’s stand is a principled one- in accordance with the Islamic ideology. The fact is Pakistan took this stand in support of Palestinians and Arabs who also opposed the emergence of Israel, and the plight of the Palestinians. 

If the stand was against the unfair treatment and cruelty to Palestinians then why did not Pakistan take a stand against Syria, Jordan, and Lebanon when they also butchered the Palestinians. The reason is these countries were Muslim and ‘friendly’ to Pakistan. (In the case of Jordan, Pakistan helped to ‘butcher’ the Palestinians in 1970). An Islamic principle demands that Muslims who are suffering must be helped and supported, and Pakistan should have helped Palestinians not the Jordanian government. 

If the Islamic principle was to be held then Pakistan should have had a different policy towards America, Iraq, Syria, Jordan, Iran, India, Afghanistan, Russia etc. 

If this principle is relaxed because perpetrators are either Muslim or too powerful and it is not prudent to stand up for this principle. Then why Pakistan has to stand up for this principle in support of Arabs and Palestinians when they themselves have abandoned it. These countries have abandoned it because they think it is in their national interest to do so. Egypt did that despite the plight of the other neighbours and the Palestinians. 

Pakistan supported them, and continued to do so even though it is not in the national interest to continue with this policy anymore. Pakistan wholeheartedly supported the Arabs and the Palestinians against Israel and won Israel’s animosity, and has lost considerably in every walk of life. Pakistan had a similar situation with India – wars and war like situations throughout her short history. Have the Arabs and the Palestinians reciprocated by supporting Pakistan wholeheartedly? Arabs and the Palestinians are friendlier to India than Pakistan. India has a better political and economic relationship with them. It doesn’t even occur to them that Pakistan can also provide more or less the same services currently provided by India. 

Some Arabs and Palestinians have become friends of Israel a long time ago and Pakistanis who went out of their way to support them appear to be ‘idiots’. They have adopted foreign policy to suit their national interests, and Pakistan continues to support the policy, which they have abandoned and get animosity from Israel. Is there any logic in that? 

Moreover Pakistan has a ‘principled’ stand over Kashmir. What these countries have done to support Pakistan. 

1. They all have political, diplomatic and good economic links with India. 

2. At times these countries pay lip service in support of Pakistan without endangering their political, diplomatic and economic interests. Is it not possible for Pakistan to learn from this? 

What should Pakistan do 

1. Support them but at the same time have diplomatic, trade and military links with Israel, and see how Pakistani interest can be protected and enhanced. 

2. By doing this Pakistan would benefit immensely, at least Israeli opposition to Pakistan would be neutralised. And this itself will go long way to protect Pakistani national interest 

3. As it is clear, this act would not be in the interest of Pakistan government, but one should see what is in the long interest of Pakistan, rather than the government. 

4. By becoming friendly, Pakistan may have more chances of influencing over Palestine and other issues. 

No government in the past had the courage, necessary control or the will to take such a decision. It seems that this government has the courage and nerve to take unpopular decisions. It has full control over the levers of powers and can take the necessary decision. If this government, for whatever reason, did not take a much needed decision then it would be years before any other government could even dare to think about it. 

National interest of Pakistan demands that the following two matters are resolved as soon as possible: 

• Resolution of the Kashmir dispute 

• Recognition of Israel 

Writer is a Chairman of JKLF Diplomatic Committee, and author of many books and booklets on Kashmir. 

Sunday, 22 November 2020

Pakistan is not afraid of India, Dr Shabir Choudhry

Pakistan is not afraid of India.

Dr Shabir Choudhry       21 November 2020

 

Vast number of Pakistanis are brainwashed into believing that their army is the number one army in the world, exceptionally courageous, patriotic and invincible. Also they believe that their prime secret agency, Inter Service Intelligence, is number one in the world, and that other secret agencies and countries are afraid of Pakistan.

 

These Pakistanis also believe that their nuclear bombs, including tactical nuclear devices, and the delivery system and other missile systems are unique and best in the world. They believe that even in a conventional war, the Pakistan army will surprise everyone, and they will capture Jammu and Kashmir and could possibly hoist a Pakistani flag on the Red Fort.

 

I had a difficult conversation with one middle ranking officer of the Pakistan army. He angrily said:

 

‘We are not afraid of India. We are smaller than India. We have less resources, but we are better fighters, more committed and are capable of defeating India; and  don’t give me an example of 1971. It was a political defeat. We are a totally different army now, highly trained and disciplined. We are a battle hardened army with strong dedication, religious fervour and patriotism. In the next round of war we will surprise India and other adversaries. There must be a reason why people regard us as the best army in the world’.

 

I said the army that has lost all the wars is the best, but what about the armies which have not lost any war. Are they not highly trained and disciplined?

 

‘India did not win in 1947, in 1965 or in the Kargil war’, he retorted. ‘In 1971, it was a political defeat; and don’t forget, India lost in 1962 war with China too’.

 

I replied, I did not even mention India. Why are you so obsessed with India. I know the Pakistani soldiers are very brave and dedicated, but war strategies are formulated by the Generals, and I am not sure if they have the same kind of commitment and passion for a war with India.

 

He was clearly not happy with what I said. His reply was: ‘I know what was in your mind. You may be knowledgeable in other fields, but your knowledge on the Pakistan army is very basic’.

 

It was my turn to interrupt him, I said, ‘OK, I am not an expert on Pakistan army, but I have read many books written by the retired Pakistani army officers, and other Pakistani writers. Tell me why your brave army Generals released the Indian pilot Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthaman, who came to inflict damage and kill people in Pakistan? A few weeks ago it was a talk in Pakistani social and political circles about wet paints, sweat and shaking legs after the threat of Indian reprisals. If you people are so brave, why legs were shaking, and why the pilot was immediately released; and why Pakistani establishment was begging China, Britain, American, Saudi Arabia and even tiny UAE to intervene and save Pakistan from the Indian attack’.


He tried to  interrupt me, but I continued, ‘If that was a good - will gesture, as they claim. It was a desperate gesture to appease India, or neutralise the Indian anger. If you are so kind hearted, then why don’t you demonstrate a similar good will gesture and release missing people who were abducted from various parts of Balochistan and KPK? Why not release political prisoners of Gilgit and Baltistan and so called Azad Kashmir’.

 

As there was no reply to the above, and it was too much for his tolerance and ego, he used a swear word and disconnected the phone. It is good that we were holding this conversation on the phone, otherwise he would have attacked me physically.

 

I can agree that the Pakistani soldiers and middle ranking officers are very dedicated and brave, however, the same cannot be said about the senior officers. The top brass of the army know their strength, dedication and their resources; and international support which is crucial in wars. They also know what resources India has, how strong is their army, and what international support they have, and even among the Muslim countries.

 

Pakistan learnt many lessons from the defeat of 1971, and formulated  new strategies to teach lessons to India. One such strategy was never to have a full scale war with India. Instead, use proxies to bleed India with thousand cuts, hit India economically and divide the Indian society on religious lines to justify the creation of Pakistan and its existence.

 

They have engaged India not only in Jammu and Kashmir, but also in other parts of India. With a systematic campaign, they bled India, and generated so much hatred that the majority of people of Pakistan, Kashmir, so called Azad Kashmir and Gilgit Baltistan see India as a culprit.

 

Pakistani and their supporters in Kashmir POJK and Gilgit Baltistan think it is India which has started a proxy war against Pakistan, and they are behind all wrong doings in Pakistan. So much so that if someone sells a donkey meat or fake medicine in Pakistan, these stalwarts of Pakistan will accuse India for that.

 

With active support and help of China, Pakistan engaged India at different levels. At the same time, Pakistan spent a huge amount of money to develop its nuclear capability, improving delivery system, missiles, air force and submarines. They have also developed a second strike ability in case of a nuclear war.

Experts estimate that the Pakistani nuclear arsenal is around 150 bombs, more than enough to cause havoc in the region and the world. They have the ability to develop more than 40 more warheads. 

 

To care, protect and develop strategies for the nuclear weapons, Pakistan has created a special division for the nuclear weapons, called Strategic Plans Division. It is believed that the most of these weapons are stored in very safe places, like in the Punjab Province, and not in KPK which is unstable and under the influence of the Taliban and extremists.

 

Pakistan can effectively deliver nuclear weapons on target by land, air and sea. They have also developed a second strike capability, which according to some Pakistani experts, enable Pakistan to fight a nuclear war, if that becomes an issue of the country's survival.

 

Pakistan’s top bureaucrat, Roedad Khan, in his book, ‘Pakistan a Slave State’ wrote about wars:

 

‘It is incontestable that economic power, more than anything else, determines the outcome of a long - drawn - out war but this is not true of short, lightning wars lasting for a few weeks only like the three wars fought by India and Pakistan. The outcome of

such short wars is determined more by military organization, preparedness, leadership, and national morale’. 1

 

He further said that because Pakistan is economically weak with nuclear weapons, and is not in a position to fight a long war with India, therefore, Pakistan for its survival must prepare for a short and a defensive war with India. 2

 

Outcome of any war, short or long, is determined by a talented and determined army leader and superior technology. The Indian army is larger than that of Pakistan. Also their air force, navy and other weapons have clear superiority over Pakistan. Indian economy and international standing is much better than Pakistan.

 

Pakistani nuclear bombs could be delivered on target by land, air and sea. Pakistani Jet fighters capable of delivering nuclear bombs have to penetrate Indian air space, which is not that easy because of India’s air defense system. In view of this, Pakistan is more than likely to use land and sea if the situation demanded.

 

For the land delivery system, Pakistan can use Hatf  mobile missiles, which include ‘the solid-fueled Hatf-III (180 miles), solid-fuelled Hatf-IV (466 miles) and liquid-fuelled Hatf V, (766 miles)’. The Shaheen missiles could also be used to deliver nukes on target, especially in faraway areas. 3

 

From sea, Pakistan can use Babar cruise missiles to deliver the nuclear bombs on targets. Babar 2 can also be used by seal and land. In January 2020, Pakistan successfully tested, Babur-3, which in view of Kyle Mizokami ‘would be the most survivable of all Pakistani nuclear delivery systems’. 4

 

Despite this nuclear muscle and formidable conventional strength and dedication of the fighting force, the army leadership is not convinced that they can defeat India in a conventional war. They prefer to use proxies to keep India bleeding in Kashmir and elsewhere.

 

This is not to suggest that Indian hands are clean and that India does not interfere in matters of Pakistan. No matter what pressure India applies on Pakistan, or for that matter, what the international community says about the Pakistani policy of using proxies to advance their agenda, the establishment of Pakistan very bravely, under different pretexts continue to use their proxies to commit acts of violence and terrorism.

 

That is a big success of the Pakistani strategy. They have been bleeding India by using proxies (no need to mention Afghanistan) for many decades. India picked up dead bodies, treated injured, tolerated economic loss, stomached national pride, and bravely issued threats which they were not capable of carrying out.

 

The Pakistani ruling elite knew that these were just threats. It is like a naughty boy troubles a teacher in a classroom, and the teacher gives certain threats to the child to discipline him. The child laughs, and continues with his mischief in the class.

 

Similarly, each time a big event takes place, India says enough is enough, if it happens again, we will retaliate. People who matter in Pakistan smile at this, and continue with their mission. Another incident takes place, and India once again condemns it, and warns Pakistan not to do it again or face reprisals. This goes on without a break.

 

Pakistan’s top army officers are conscious of this fact they cannot fight a conventional war with India for too long. Use of tactical nuclear weapons is not a sensible or a serious option, because the consequence of that is too dreadful to contemplate.

 

In view of this, fall back for the Pakistani army is to get support from China; either Chinese direct involvement in the war or seriously engage India on multiple points along the LAC.

 

We can appreciate Pakistan’s ‘bravery’ when it comes to India. However we request the Pakistan establishment to let us live in peace. We people of the divided State of Jammu and Kashmir want to live in peace. We have no animosity with India or Pakistan.

 

Please don’t kill us by the LOC firing. It doesn’t matter who starts the firing, we the people of the divided state suffer on both sides of the divide. This policy must stop, and stop immediately so that our people can get some relief.

In this regard, we request Pakistani establishment to stop sending militants across the LOC which triggers the LOC firing. Also we request the Pakistani establishment to move out their camps and safe houses of the militants from the villages because their presence invites the Indian reprisals; and innocent people die as a direct result of that.

 

We request both governments to make the LOC violence free zone by making 5 miles peace zone along the LOC where the people of Jammu and Kashmir can interact and socialise.

 

Also we request the Pakistani establishment to abandon their policy of nourishing extremist groups like Taliban, LeT, JeM, LeJ, TLP and many others, who are exporting violence and terrorism, and intimidating and harassing the local people.

Tuesday, 17 November 2020

Game of Pakistani establishment in Gilgit Baltistan. POK must not be used as a launching pad.

Game of Pakistani establishment in Gilgit Baltistan. POK must not be used as a launching pad.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FcTSsGGS4Vs&feature=youtu.be

Monday, 16 November 2020

Islamabad is under siege: Army controls Red Zone, but Pakistani media is not showing any news on this. It shows how independent is media in Pakistan.

Islamabad is under siege: Army controls Red Zone, but Pakistani media is not showing any news on this. It shows how independent is media in Pakistan.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ay4qMxY6F2o

Foot soldiers and collaborators should not view this programme

Foot soldiers and collaborators should not view this programme:


Why LOC firing takes place - LOC should become violence free zone.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NmIAPZHIVCc&feature=youtu.be