Wednesday, 19 June 2019

After Billions in Chinese Investment Oman’s Duqm Port Could Help Bypass Hormuz.


After Billions in Chinese Investment Oman’s Duqm Port Could Help Bypass Hormuz, June 16th, 2019    Sabena Siddiqi
Located between the Gulfs of Oman and Aden, Oman’s Duqm port has special importance as it lies along the Strait of Hormuz, Gulf of Oman, Indian Ocean and the Arabian Sea.
With this strategic location, it is not only close to South Asian countries like India and Pakistan, it is also easily accessible from East Africa. Since joining the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in 2018, Oman has acquired additional importance as it has emerged as China’s first base-station in the Gulf.
Securing dependable and secure energy resources has always been a top priority for Beijing and there is no better place for attaining these goals than the Middle East which holds 48% of oil reserves and 40 % of gas reserves globally. Therefore, a $10.7 bn Sino-Oman industrial city and the Duqm Special Economic Zone (SEZAD) are being developed. Once ready, this will be the biggest SEZ of the MENA region.
Securing dependable and secure energy resources has always been a top priority for Beijing and there is no better place for attaining these goals than the Middle East which holds 48% of oil reserves and 40 % of gas reserves globally

As the first phase of construction approaches completion in 2020,  Duqm will have the capacity to link several continents with the logistics and infrastructure built with Chinese investment. As China’s main energy corridors, these Middle Eastern routes are the “oil roads” of the BRI, according to Lu Ruquan, Director of the Strategic Development Department of the China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC).
Notably, Oman will be the first energy producing country which is also a central BRI node in the Gulf with well-located ports. For successful business ventures, peace is the first requirement and Muscat has managed to have good ties in the region as well as with Iran, India, China and the U.S. simultaneously. Balancing its relations, Oman has encouraged foreign investment from all and the rivalry between various powers makes no difference.
Another interesting aspect about Duqm port is that it can be an alternate route outside the Straits of Hormuz with direct access to the Arabian Sea. Considering that the Strait is quite unstable due to U.S.-Iran frictions these days, it seems likely that more attention will be given to Duqm in the days ahead.

Another interesting aspect about Duqm port is that it can be an alternate routeoutside the Straits of Hormuz with direct access to the Arabian Sea. Considering that the Strait is quite unstable due to U.S.-Iran frictions these days, it seems likely that more attention will be given to Duqm in the days ahead. Recent attacks on oil vessels near the Strait of Hormuz might even force shipping companies to consider Duqm instead as a safer route. Located in Oman’s East, it is far away from the scene of the conflict these days.
Indirectly, the U.S.-Iran conflict could even promote Oman and most of all, Duqm port, owing to its crucial location. Being a stable, neutral state with no terrorism or war threats even though it is situated in a potentially volatile region, Oman could benefit from the ongoing tussle in the region. Having a strategic port deal with Oman, even Washington can have better access to the Gulf and an alternate route for its ships if the need arises.
Bypassing the Strait of Hormuz is an important military option right now as tensions with Iran show no signs of abating. According to a statement from the U.S. embassy in Oman, the bilateral agreement provides access to facilities and ports in Duqm and Salalah and “reaffirms the commitment of both countries to promoting mutual security goals.” Being a big port, Duqm can even turn around an aircraft carrier according to U.S. officials.
Considering the current geopolitical scenario, the time has come for Oman to reap the benefits of its strategic location as well as its neutral foreign policy. Even though Duqm and other Omani ports are right at the center of a global competition for influence, Muscat’s stance continues to be neutral and it does not seem perturbed.
Even though Duqm and other Omani ports are right at the center of a global competition for influence, Muscat’s stance continues to be neutral
Also having an agreement with New Delhi for logistics support and long-term anti-piracy operations, Oman provides maintenance facilities for Indian ships at Duqm, the only port in the area with repair facilities for large vessels. Only last month, joint exercises were held with the Japanese navy and the port remains a supply and refueling base for the British, Japanese and American navies.
In tandem, the Beijing-Muscat alliance is on its peak and this is what makes Duqm an interesting case. Instead of exclusively giving space to one country, it gives space to other nations as well and this may be the secret of its success. There are some drawbacks and just like with Gwadar, another BRI port in Pakistan, observers wonder whether China could use Duqm for military purposes.
observers wonder whether China could use Duqm for military purposes
According to the ‘string of pearls’ sea-lane strategy, China requires several ports in Pakistan, Myanmar, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh to achieve dominance. However, China invested to upgrade its energy security and build a large trade network to stem its slowing economic growth.
For now, the BRI has helped diversify Arab economies and boosted energy activities in the region. Nowadays, China is negotiating a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Once this is finalized, most uncertainties surrounding the BRI would be done away with.
Sabena Siddiqi is a Foreign Affairs Journalist and Geopolitical analyst based in Karachi, Pakistan. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of Al Bawaba News.



Sunday, 9 June 2019

Dr Shabir Choudhry speaks about injustice & oppression in Jammu and Kashmir state.

Dr Shabir Choudhry speaks about injustice & oppression in Jammu and Kashmir state.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbr-AJ5fTK8&feature=youtu.be

Saturday, 8 June 2019

Ex - US diplomat blames Israel for Pakistani dictator’s death

Ex - US diplomat blames Israel for Pakistani dictator’s death

A retired US ambassador has reignited the debate about one of south Asia's greatest whodunits, the death in 1988 of Pakistan's president General Zia ul-Haq, by saying that Israel was responsible.

John Gunther Dean, then US ambassador to India, said he suspected Israel's secret service Mossad of downing Gen Zia's aircraft in an effort to stop Pakistan developing the nuclear bomb. But when he reported these suspicions to Washington, he was accused of being mentally unbalanced and subsequently forced into retirement. Almost 20 years later, Mr Dean, 80, was speaking out in an attempt to tell his side of the story.

The circumstances of Gen Zia ul-Haq's death are as contentious as the 1963 assassination of John F Kennedy. The military dictator died on August 17 1988, after leaving the town of Bahawalpur, in Punjab province, where he had been watching a trial of American M1 tanks.
Moments after Gen Zia's C-130 plane took off it wobbled then plunged to the ground, killing all on board including the US ambassador to Pakistan and a US general. Conspiracy theorists have focused on a crate of mangos placed on board moments before take-off. Some believe it was sprayed with VX, a poison gas, which only a few countries had.
Gen Zia had a long list of enemies, all of whom have been blamed for his death over the years. But Israel has received little attention. Mr Dean told the World Policy Journal that it was plausible Mossad had orchestrated an assassination plot, believing Gen Zia's boast that he was only "a screwdriver's turn away from the bomb". But when he told his superiors he was removed from his position in Delhi and his career ended. Mr Dean, a Jew who fled Nazi Germany, said he had no proof of Israeli responsibility. General Muhammad Ali Durrani, a retired Zia-era commander, told the journal the Israeli thesis was "far-fetched" and blamed the crash on the C-130, which he said had a history of faults.

At this critical time…

… for our natural world, our societies and our media, The Guardian is committed to a different model for open, independent journalism – sustained through generous reader support. When progressive ideals are being challenged by those in power across the globe, we’re dedicated to investigating with courage and reporting with honesty. But we need your ongoing support to keep working as we do.
The Guardian will engage with the most critical issues of our time – from the escalating climate catastrophe to widespread inequality to the influence of big tech on our lives. At a time when factual information is a necessity, we believe that each of us, around the world, deserves access to accurate reporting with integrity at its heart.
Our editorial independence means we set our own agenda and voice our own opinions. Guardian journalism is free from commercial and political bias and not influenced by billionaire owners or shareholders. This means we can give a voice to those less heard, explore where others turn away, and rigorously challenge those in power.
We need your support to keep delivering quality journalism, to maintain our openness and to protect our precious independence. Every reader contribution, big or small, is so valuable. 
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/dec/05/pakistan.israel

A retired US ambassador has reignited the debate about one of south Asia's greatest whodunits, the death in 1988 of Pakistan's president General Zia ul-Haq, by saying that Israel was responsible.

John Gunther Dean, then US ambassador to India, said he suspected Israel's secret service Mossad of downing Gen Zia's aircraft in an effort to stop Pakistan developing the nuclear bomb. But when he reported these suspicions to Washington, he was accused of being mentally unbalanced and subsequently forced into retirement. Almost 20 years later, Mr Dean, 80, was speaking out in an attempt to tell his side of the story.

The circumstances of Gen Zia ul-Haq's death are as contentious as the 1963 assassination of John F Kennedy. The military dictator died on August 17 1988, after leaving the town of Bahawalpur, in Punjab province, where he had been watching a trial of American M1 tanks.
Moments after Gen Zia's C-130 plane took off it wobbled then plunged to the ground, killing all on board including the US ambassador to Pakistan and a US general. Conspiracy theorists have focused on a crate of mangos placed on board moments before take-off. Some believe it was sprayed with VX, a poison gas, which only a few countries had.
Gen Zia had a long list of enemies, all of whom have been blamed for his death over the years. But Israel has received little attention. Mr Dean told the World Policy Journal that it was plausible Mossad had orchestrated an assassination plot, believing Gen Zia's boast that he was only "a screwdriver's turn away from the bomb". But when he told his superiors he was removed from his position in Delhi and his career ended. Mr Dean, a Jew who fled Nazi Germany, said he had no proof of Israeli responsibility. General Muhammad Ali Durrani, a retired Zia-era commander, told the journal the Israeli thesis was "far-fetched" and blamed the crash on the C-130, which he said had a history of faults.

At this critical time…

… for our natural world, our societies and our media, The Guardian is committed to a different model for open, independent journalism – sustained through generous reader support. When progressive ideals are being challenged by those in power across the globe, we’re dedicated to investigating with courage and reporting with honesty. But we need your ongoing support to keep working as we do.
The Guardian will engage with the most critical issues of our time – from the escalating climate catastrophe to widespread inequality to the influence of big tech on our lives. At a time when factual information is a necessity, we believe that each of us, around the world, deserves access to accurate reporting with integrity at its heart.
Our editorial independence means we set our own agenda and voice our own opinions. Guardian journalism is free from commercial and political bias and not influenced by billionaire owners or shareholders. This means we can give a voice to those less heard, explore where others turn away, and rigorously challenge those in power.
We need your support to keep delivering quality journalism, to maintain our openness and to protect our precious independence. Every reader contribution, big or small, is so valuable. 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/dec/05/pakistan.israel