Thursday, 11 December 2014

Bleeding Sindh, by Dr Ayesha Siddiqa

As Imran Khan and the PTI vociferously protest the death of their worker in Faisalabad, many mothers elsewhere in the country must be sitting lamenting their sons and wondering who will lock down the country and force the state to answer why their sons will not return. While we all got used to missing persons and tortured bodies in Balochistan, it’s odd to find Sindh becoming part of the same tragic cycle.

Death and dead bodies are not new to Sindh. Every decade since the 1980s, the province has bled for one reason or the other. But this current spate of killings seems to be a new pattern. It is almost as if Sindhi nationalism is being woken up. Interestingly, the six dead bodies found recently did not belong to violent nationalists. In fact, five out of the six were men who had moved on in life. Notwithstanding old associations with the JSMM, these people were not actively involved in any ‘anti-state’ activity or even in party politics.

In any case, one thought that from the state’s perspective, Sindh was not Balochistan. The province had been through this phase during the 1980s when people challenged the military regime and were killed for it. Like Balochistan, Sindh was politically vibrant. The Sindhi media and intelligentsia was politically active and educated people about issues in its own language. Fast-forward to the 2000s, things were manipulated and changed. Despite the media still being active, it has begun to behave and sound more like the media in the rest of the country. What the state couldn’t purchase or silence was bought over by influential dons.

One also thought that the state was using two other tools to repair relations with Sindh. First, approximately 80,000 men were inducted into the army during the Musharraf period that naturally increased effectiveness of old and new cantonments and cadet colleges in different places in the province. In fact, one came across Sindhi expatriates and intellectuals, who would argue in favour of their people joining the civil and military bureaucracy. Many scions of influential families joined the security establishment in different positions to enhance their power and influence.

Second, the province was gradually but systematically infested with militant organisations, madrassas and other infrastructure. In any case, the JUI-F and the JUI-S were expanding their influence, which was obvious from the votes that the late Khalid Soomro got in Larkana contesting the 1990 elections against Benazir Bhutto. Given the absence of a forceful narrative to counter the gradually melting feudalism (that turned into neo-feudalism), the new middle class in Sindh was getting attracted to religious discourse. Certain religious organisations got lots of opportunities to bring back traditional support for them in Sindh back to life in a newer form.

So, one really wonders why it was felt that there was a need to light a fire in Sindh. Such killings can only provoke anger and resentment, especially amongst the youth who are abandoned both by the state and the political governments. The stories of poor governance, corruption and neglect of the people are far too gory for anyone to claim that the PPP and its leadership are not to blame. As a political party, the PPP is both a perpetrator and victim of the wave of violence. It is responsible for not crying out loud against what is happening in the province it claims to control. The collusion between its key leaders and the security apparatus denoted by joint exploitation of resources makes its behaviour questionable. Yet, it is a party that will find itself in a deeper mess if the violence doesn’t stop. It would be even more tragic if it has to become party to the greater intrusion of the security apparatus that will step in under the pretext of securing the place against ‘violent nationalism’. Recently, the chairman of the Sindhi Taraqi Pasand Party, Qadir Magsi, rightly warned the JSMM against an armed struggle as it could result in greater losses and deaths of Sindhi youth. Moreover, violence will eventually open doors even wider for both the military and religious militants to expand their existing influence. Then, things will get so muddled that no one will seem to have a recipe other than perhaps, the Chinese. But in the process, the tranquility and serenity of the place will disappear forever. The Sufi tradition, multiculturalism and tolerance, which are already drifting away, will become things of the past. Even nationalists wouldn’t realise when they start seeking help of militants because there is no other help available. It is quite likely that, like in Balochistan where al Qaeda seems to have taken up the cause of Baloch nationalism, forces of extremism will determine Sindh’s politics.

While we try to solve the mystery of why Sindh is being sinned against, it is important to note that all moderate political forces are disappearing. This is also a reference to the recent killing of the JUI-F’s Dr Soomro. Although the partnership between the PPP and the JUI-F during the last six years played a critical role in strengthening the latter and bringing in militant elements into Sindh, which mostly came under the religious party’s umbrella, Dr Soomro was a political man who cared for Sindhi nationalism as well. Even if he hadn’t died, he would find himself less effective in the face of the evolving politics of Sindh. Some people even argue that his death may be linked with his nationalistic perspective rather than anything else. Not to forget that the JUI-F has an interesting legacy and historically had a leadership that opposed the official nationalist narrative. This was also a party where the poitics of the left and right merged together. The death of leaders like Dr Soomro indicate a transition towards a different kind of leadership or the rising influence of new militant groups in Sindh, which are more aligned with Islamabad’s nationalist perspective. A new hybrid-theocratic society is in the process of being born.
Sindh has had a legacy of great history and traditions. While we can all think of demons that can be held responsible for the current mayhem, there is no time to waste if we want to stop the bleeding. The state must be held accountable and made to stop this bloodshed.
Published in The Express Tribune, December 11th, 2014.


Wednesday, 10 December 2014

Bold Modi tackles Muslim Kashmir head on, by Andrew Whitehead BBC World Service

Bold Modi tackles Muslim Kashmir head on, by Andrew Whitehead BBC World Service
A Hindu nationalist prime minister of India addressing a big election rally in Muslim majority Kashmir, the most troubled and disaffected corner of his nation.
That's the bold political move Narendra Modi made on Monday.
It's a sign of his style - highly engaged, politically courageous, much more pragmatic than his detractors expected - but offering few concessions on what he sees as the issues fundamental to rebuilding India's national confidence and standing.
In his six months in office, Modi has often startled and surprised observers, and shown a boldness rarely evident at the top level of Indian politics in recent years.
He has established a dominance of the country's political landscape arguably unparalleled since the death of Indira Gandhi 30 years ago.
Taking to the podium at a cricket stadium in the Kashmiri capital, Srinagar, Mr Modi sported a pheran, the woollen cape-like garment which is as typically Kashmiri as you can get. Much more of a political statement than a fashion statement.
“Start Quote
I have come to give you justice”
Narendra Modi Prime Minster of India
And a move that attracted approving newspaper headlines in Kashmir even before the crowds started gathering.
It was many years, he declared, since an Indian national leader had addressed an election rally in the main part of the historic Sher-e-Kashmir stadium.
The stadium's name translates as Lion of Kashmir - the title given to the iconic Kashmiri nationalist leader from the 1940s to his death in 1982, Sheikh Abdullah.
At times in his long political career, Sheikh Abdullah supported Indian rule - at times, he called for self-determination for Kashmir and spent many years in Indian jails as a result.
The current state assembly elections in Jammu and Kashmir are the occasion for the prime minister's visit, and he pointed to the high turnout in early rounds of voting as a sign that Kashmiris had rejected violence.
Concerns acknowledged
His critics complained that Srinagar was in lock-down, and the internet shut down, while the prime minister was in town.
And the state's chief minister, Omar Abdullah - the grandson of Sheikh Abdullah - commented acidly that trainloads of supporters of Mr Modi's BJP had been brought in for the event from Hindu-majority Jammu. "Why not just have the rally there?" he tweeted.
But the point of Mr Modi's visit was precisely to be heard and seen at the centre of Kashmiri culture and history - sticking narrowly to his political heartland is not his style
Mr Modi promised his audience in Srinagar that he would deliver jobs, prosperity and an end to corruption. He praised Indian soldiers for safeguarding democracy, but also acknowledged Kashmiri concerns about trigger-happy troops.
For the first time in 30 years, he declared, the army had acknowledged its error in the recent killing of two young Kashmiris, and action had been taken against those responsible.
"It is proof of my intentions," he declared. "I have come to give you justice."
Tens of thousands of Kashmiris, and Indian soldiers and police, have been killed during decades of separatist insurgency.
Relations with Pakistan - seen by many Indians as supporters or indeed instigators of separatist violence - remain tense, and there has been an increase in incidents on the nearby border and ceasefire line.
Overall though, the level of violence in Kashmir has fallen sharply in recent years.
The Indian authorities believe that there may be not many more than 100 armed separatists active in the Kashmir valley.
Yet among many young Kashmiris, there remains deep disaffection with Indian rule and distrust in mainstream politics.
Separatist campaign
When Narendra Modi addresses Kashmiris, he knows that few are supporters of his party and many don't want to be part of the nation he leads.
The BJP wants still greater integration of Kashmir with the rest of India - and in his speech, the prime minister gave no indication of a new approach to demands from many Kashmiris for autonomy or for separation from India.
"Narendra Modi didn't reach out to the people of Kashmir politically", says Shuja'at Bukhari, editor of the Rising Kashmir newspaper, "and the basic issue of alienation remains".
line
Muslim marginalisation:
India's general elections earlier this year that gave the BJP a landslide victory also served to underline the political marginalisation of the country's Muslims.
Although the BJP has had Muslim members of Parliament in the past, there are currently no Muslims in BJP ranks in the lower house.
Muslims make up one-in-seven of India's population - but just one-in-27 of its MPs in the Lok Sabha (India's equivalent of the House of Commons.)
Yet fears voiced by Narendra Modi's detractors that given the chance, he would erode the country's democracy, chip away at the secularism on which independent India has been based, and further diminish the standing of Muslims and other religious minorities have not been borne out.
line
But he keeps on coming back to Kashmir.
He has visited more often than any recent prime minister - and in October chose to spend the most widely celebrated Hindu festival of Diwali in Kashmir, where (Indian soldiers apart) Hindus now make up a tiny proportion of the population.
It was, he said, to show sympathy for those affected by floods which had devastated Srinagar the previous month.
"I have come to share your pain and anguish," Modi told his audience in Srinagar on Monday.
Not all will take that statement at face value.
But even those Kashmiris who kept away from the Sher-e-Kashmir stadium may take comfort in an Indian leader who comes to Kashmir rather than ignores it.
·         Andrew Whitehead, editor of BBC World Service News, is a former BBC Delhi correspondent and the author of a book about the origins of the Kashmir conflict.


Tuesday, 9 December 2014

Hypocrisy or mental illness? Marvi Sirmed

Hypocrisy or mental illness? Marvi Sirmed

When I first watched Junaid Jamshaid’s video that later landed him in trouble, I freaked out seeing the amount of misogyny that oozed from this pop singer-turned-televangelist. In his strong convictions about the inherent flaws of women, he forgot whom he was talking about.

Had it not been the blasphemy vigilantism, the video would have gone unnoticed just as all misogynist and sexist content routinely does. This was not the first time JJ demonstrated his utter contempt for women. It was probably last year that his disturbing statement emerged about women driving cars. He advised his fellow Muslim men to restrict women’s mobility and to never teach them how to drive a car. In the same statement – available on video – he gave his personal example and informed the audience how he had so far resisted letting his wife drive. This, he informed, was because the women who drove insisted on going out alone, which was the root cause of increasing obscenity and indecency in society.

In the recent video, the crux of his jeremiad was that women – irrespective of who they are – are inherently flawed and always seek the attention of men by deceit and manipulation. The core was missed but the periphery was picked up on. Now, the issue is not what was said but whom it was said about. In other words, it would have been all right had he said those words without bringing Hazrat Ayesha (RA) into it.

Disturbing

Even more disturbing was when after being booked for blasphemy, he made a video of himself making apologies to Muslims. In a passing reference, he said he sought apologies from the Almighty, but the main thing remained the forgiveness of the Ummah, having loaded a gun at him. In simple words, for him, God doesn’t matter all that much; what matters is the sword and the gun and the people who wield it.

Perplexing

Even more perplexing is the fact that most of the religion sellers – the ‘preaching’ class – seem to have either already decided to forgive him or to carry on with the holy duty of murdering and slaughtering. Cases in point are televised statements of Amir Liaqat Hussain and a video documented by Maulvi Tariq Jamil of Tableeghi Jama’at. Tariq Jamil showcased his tears and lamented on the state of an Ummah that insists on killing in the name of religion, while Amir Liaqat, in his usual flowery language demonstrated his even deeper misogyny.

In his bid to exonerate JJ, Amir Liaqat took two-thirds of his airtime in explaining what a big sinner JJ was for having said those things, and how righteous he himself was for hating on the blasphemy committed by JJ. His final lines asked the audience to forgive Junaid for he was human and it was human to err. He, however, deemed it fit to include as much misogyny as possible.

In order to appear more righteous than Junaid, he called the mother of anyone who didn’t love Ayesha (RA), a prostitute (fahisha). When he said he’d like to clarify his statement the following day, he arrived with another choice word, claiming that his own mother should be accused of being what is basically a contemptuous term for dancing women, if he ever fails to love Hazrat Ayesha (RA). One wonders why all the bad words about mothers? Why not about his own self? The icing on the cake was his declaration that if he ever took money for the Ramzan transmission on TV, it would be like committing zina with his own mother. The absence of any outrage over these statements is enough to safely believe that society is okay with it. Abuse mothers and women whenever you feel like abusing one another.

Both of them were joined by Mufti Naeem of the Madrassa Binoria who was quick to declare the matter closed and disposed off because Junaid had already apologized. Anyone who still makes it an issue on media, said the Mufti, would be creating fitna – unrest – amongst the Ummah. The matter was then taken up by Allama Tanveer ul Hassan from Jaamia tul Madina of Faisalabad. He declared Junaid liable to be slaughtered, beheaded to be precise, because the Ummah in his opinion was not mandated to forgive him. It was Allah alone who could forgive him after his beheading.

This has now turned into a whack-a-mole. There emerges one Barelvi ‘mufti’ or ‘aalim’ who declares JJ liable to be killed and there appear several Deobandi ‘aalims’ to exonerate him based on his video apology that he sought from Muslims. The consensus however, so far, is to let him go. Great, isn’t it? The Ummah is coming of age, right? The Ummah seems to have decided that blasphemy can be an error of judgment or a mistake. The Ummah seems to have decided that such mistakes, if realized and apologized for, can be forgiven.

It has so far not occurred to us what happened when Aasiya Bibi sought our apology? Or Junaid Hafeez? Both, while believing that they didn’t even commit blasphemy. Now that we have done it, can we do the same for Aasiya Bibi? Why couldn’t we watch two consecutive programs by Amir Liaqat when the pious demonstrated the ‘peacefulness’ of their religion in Kot Radha Kishan? Why didn’t a video come out showing Tariq Jamil shedding tears on the overreaction on other blasphemy accusations? Why didn’t Junaid Jamshed write the statement while making a case of his victimhood based on his sect? Can’t we smell something dreadfully rotten in this state of the pure?

Why didn’t we see outrage to save the honour of the Prophet (PBUH) when it was proven in the court of law that Khalid Jadoon, the local cleric, had burnt the pages of the Quran to put the blasphemy allegation on Rimsha Masih? This passion for ‘forgiveness’ was not seen when Shaista Lodhi sought an apology based on something she had never committed. But that went on deaf ears. When a powerful institution of this country wanted, it used blasphemy against Geo selectively while ignoring exactly the same incident by ARY.

Even the ‘last hope’ for a ‘Naya Pakistan’ had invited the Pakistan Sunni Ittehad Council to seek support in their Faisalabad shut down call. The Sunni Ittehad Council is the one that had once supported the fatwa against Shaheed Salmaan Taseer and have now registered a blasphemy case against Junaid Jamshed.

Amazing to see how these ‘small’ decisions of our establishment-supported powerful ruling elite, their little marriages of convenience are strengthening and empowering the elements that keep playing havoc with the collective mental health of this nation. I don’t think we need interfaith harmony or de-radicalization programs anymore. What we need is an entire army of psychiatrists to treat us from the mental illness we’ve embraced as part of our existence.

The writer is an Islamabad based freelance columnist.
Twitter: @marvisirmed
Was originally published in The Nation on Tuesday December 9, 2014


Monday, 8 December 2014

The Giglit verdict and beyond, Mr Salim Haq

The Giglit verdict and beyond, Mr Salim Haq
New Delhi, Dec. 6, (ANI):
On November 25, 2014, the anti-terrorism court in Gilgit delivered a judgment that has huge implications for the Kashmir issue, but has unfortunately gone largely unnoticed in India.
The court sentenced the owner of the Jang-GEO group Mir Shakeelur Rehman, host of GEO TV's morning show "Utho Jago Pakistan" Shaista Lodhi, actress Veena Malik and her husband Malik Asad to 26-year imprisonment and a fine of Rs 1.3 million each for hurting religious sentiments. The show was broadcast in May 2014 and featured Malik dancing with her husband while musicians sang a devotional song.

The judgment has stunned the legal and political fraternity of Pakistan because it goes far beyond the people involved in the case.

The verdict has three dimensions:
Eminent legal experts, including Aitzaz Ahsan, Akram Sheikh, Asma Jehangir, and the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) have criticized the judgment on legal grounds - (a) The Gilgit-Baltistan courts have no jurisdiction outside that area and cannot proceed against a citizen of Pakistan; (b) Pakistani courts have dismissed 75 other FIRs against the accused in various places, including Karachi where Geo is located; (c) Any issue relating to broadcast on the electronic media can only be dealt with by PEMRA, the regulator, that had, in fact, suspended GEO TV's license for one month over the blasphemy allegation; (d) The judgment was awarded in absentia and without even hearing the accused. This is illegal under several Supreme Court judgments and raises concerns about the fairness of the trial; (e) 

The same programme was broadcast by other channels repeatedly - without facing any punishment.
If the judgment was not bad enough in terms of law, it was worse as far as media freedom is concerned and is being seen as a continuing attempt to silence free media, especially GEO.
The bottom-line is that the case having been dismissed in the courts of Pakistan, recourse was taken to the more pliable court in Gilgit to punish the GEO/Jang group. The anti-GEO forces have struck again, this time in the form of an anti-terrorist court in Gilgit.

The verdict has also drawn international condemnation with human rights organisations expressing worry for media freedom in Pakistan as well as questioning the fairness of the trial. Amnesty International said in a statement that the sentence would have a chilling effect on the freedom of expression in Pakistan.

Finally, and perhaps crucially, the judgment has put into focus the constitutional status or lack thereof of Gilgit-Baltistan and again raised the issue of its controversial legal status.
Former Chief Justice of the POK High Court Abdul Majid Malik stated that the Gilgit Court had no jurisdiction, as Gilgit-Baltistan is not a constitutional part of Pakistan, adding, "Primarily Gilgit-Baltistan is the historic and geographical part of Jammu and Kashmir state as accepted by Pakistan in the United Nations and its acknowledgement by the UN resolutions on Kashmir issue," he said. "But on the account of the delay in the settlement of the Kashmir problem through plebiscite in the light of the UN resolutions, it was deemed expedient by the government of Pakistan to give it a status under the Pakistan President's Governance Ordinance, in 2009. Since then, Gilgit-Baltistan is administered through its elected council, chief minister and the governor."

Further, the official spokesman of the government Federal Information Minister Pervez Rasheed, in response to a question on the verdict, said that the jurisdiction of the Pakistan Constitution does not extend to Gilgit-Baltistan. "The jurisdiction of our constitution is not beyond Pakistan's boundaries", Rasheed said.

All along, Pakistan has been trying to convince the international community that the areas under its control- Pakistan Occupied Kashmir, that includes so-called Azad Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan, were settled issues because the people here had voluntarily joined Pakistan. The only 'dispute' was about the area under Indian control i.e Jammu and Kashmir.
The reaction of the legal and political fraternity in Pakistan to the judgment clearly underlines that the opaque status of these areas in that they have neither been merged into Pakistan nor are they part of the territorial limits of the country.
The controversy now raised thus puts paid to Pakistan's creeping efforts to absorb Gilgit-Baltistan as its fifth province.
Internationally, now whenever Pakistan takes up the issue of J-K, it will have to be reminded that J-K includes the entire former princely state of J-K as it existed in August 1947 and not only the portion with India.
Interestingly, China has walked into this issue with a statement on Dec 02, 2014 describing Gilgit-Baltistan in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) as "Pakistan's".
China has agreed to build an ambitious economic corridor through the region linking Xinjiang to the Pakistani port of Gwadar. The corridor, which includes a plan to expand the Karakoram Highway and build a railway link through PoK, has been backed by Chinese President Xi Jinping as part of his new "Silk Road economic belt" pet project.
China would be just as embarrassed as Pakistan with this verdict because it shows conclusively that this massive investment is taking place in and though a territory that is not even Pakistan's to begin with.
This should give China a lot of food for thought.
The views expressed in the above article are those of Mr Salim Haq. (ANI)


Thursday, 4 December 2014

KASHMIR FILES Pakistan mischief is exposed by Mountbatten

KASHMIR FILES Pakistan mischief is exposed by Mountbatten 
By 
SANDEEP BAMZAI

Pakistan's unquenched thirst for Kashmir is a long-running saga. 
Its belief that it can pouch Kashmir is akin to the Sisyphus story. A Janus-faced nation attempting to wrest control of what is an integral part of the Sovereign Republic of India. 

Kashmir remains a utopian dream for Pakistan. 

Timely Warning 

The Sisyphus story is a timely warning to those who try to act too clever. 
Avaricious and deceitful, Sisyphus was famed for being the craftiest of men. As a punishment for his trickery, King Sisyphus was made to endlessly roll a huge boulder up a steep hill. 

The maddening nature of the punishment was reserved for King Sisyphus due to his hubristic belief that his cleverness surpassed that of Zeus himself. 

Clearly, in the Kashmir context, there are those who have tried to be too clever. It is interesting to note that in a confidential aide memoire written by then Governor General of India Lord Mountbatten, on Junagadh and Kashmir, dated February 25, 1948, many misplaced notions, theories, and misunderstandings have been dissipated. 

The question mark over Kashmir’s accession to India, which remains for many shrouded in controversy, can have no better defence than the one provided by Mountbatten. 

The secret brief was prepared by Lord Mountbatten for the Indian delegation to the UN Security Council. 

For good measure, he got the three chiefs of staff – Gen. R.N.N. Lockhart, commander in chief of the Indian Army, Air Marshal T W Elmhirst, commanding the Royal Indian Air Force and Rear Admiral J T S Hall – to sign on the aide memoire that no plans were made for sending Indian troops to Kashmir before October 25, three days before the tribal incursions began. 

Three Fallacies 

As Kashmir goes to the polls once again, many canards and conspiracy theories abound on plebiscites and a flawed accession. 

Reflecting on the three main misunderstandings at the time, Mountbatten provided a lucid account of what was right and wrong in terms of perception. 
The broad sweep of his aide memoire was broken down into three aspects: 

■ That the Government of India took possession of Junagadh state by force, after its legal accession to Pakistan, and has largely vitiated its case in Kashmir by its actions in Kashmir. 

■ That the Government of India brought pressure to bear, at various times, on the Maharajah and the Government of Kashmir in order to induce the State to acceded to the Dominion of India.

That the Government of India planned the dispatch of Indian forces to Kashmir sometime in advance of the actual date. 

Since Mountbatten was present in all meetings, his clear headed aide memoire offers clarity on several perceptions and myths which continue to cloud people’s judgment even to this day. 

This is what Mountbatten wrote: “On July 25, 1947, in my capacity as Crown Representative I addressed a special full meeting of the Chamber of Princes. 
"At this I informed the rulers and their representatives of the policies of the future governments of both India and Pakistan, which I had worked out with them, with regard to the formation of Instruments of Accession and Standstill Agreements by and with states.” 

Junagadh was the largest state in Kathiawar with a population of 700,000 (82 per cent Hindu), seaboard with an area of about 3500 sq miles. 
The failure of Junagadh to accede to India by August 15 caused surprise to Mountbatten’s Government, but no special action was taken to secure Junagadh’s accession. 

Once it became clear that this was happening, the Government of India pointed out to Pakistan the patent impropriety and injustice of accepting Junagadh’s accession and made two formal efforts to obtain a declaration on the intention of the Pakistan Government with regard to this matter, but there was no response. 

Test Case 
Junagadh became a test case, with other princes coming forward and airing their concerns. 
Shaliman Gardens in Kashmir, India. Myths abound over the circumstances that caused Kashmir to become part of India  Jamsaheb of Nawanagar for instance was clear that if Government of India did not prevent Junagadh from going over, the confidence of the princes would be shattered in the process as a whole. 

Mountbatten asked Lord Ismay for his counsel on the matter. Ismay believed that Jinnah had an ulterior motive and was using Junagadh as a propagandist move, playing an innocent smaller nation, with a larger game plan to use this as to chip away at Kashmir. 

Government of India didn’t move a muscle for two months after Junagadh’s accession to Pakistan.

Then came the twist. Among the large number of states in Kathiawar were Babariawad and Mangrol. Both chose to declare their independence on the lapse of paramountcy. 

Junagadh armed forces took possession of these two areas. The Prime Minister of Pakistan undertook, but failed to induce Junagadh to withdraw these forces. 
On November 1, Indian troops entered these two states under a flag of truce. To cut to the chase, a referendum was carried out in Junagadh subsequently which resulted in an overwhelming vote in India’s favour. 

Sir Mahabhatkhan Rasulkhanji had meanwhile fled to Karachi.
On Kashmir, Mountbatten’s aide memoire reveals that: “My Government put no pressure to bear on the Maharajah to cause him to accede to India. 
"Visits by Mahatma Gandhi and Acharya Kriplani to Kashmir have been quoted in support of a claim that Indian representatives (though admittedly not members of my Government) did bring pressure to bear. 

"All that I can say with regard to Gandhi’s visit is that he gave me his personal promise that he would not discuss political matters of this kind…Indeed the Government of India went out of their way to abstain from any acts which might be interpreted as inducement. 

"It was on October 24, when I was dining with Pandit Nehru, that I heard the first reports that a column of tribesmen had entered Kashmir in buses from the direction of Peshawar, and were already on the outskirts of Uri. 

"A defence committee meeting was summoned on October 25 morning and it was decided to that efforts should be made to fly arms and ammunition to Srinagar so as to give the ground forces defending the city a chance of repelling the tribesmen. 
"I reiterate that no steps were taken to plan the dispatch of Indian troops to Kashmir before October 25.” 
This ends the debate. Mountbatten should be treated as the last word.

Saturday, 29 November 2014

Disappearances and extra judicial killings of Sindhi nationalists continues with impunity

Disappearances and extra judicial killings of Sindhi nationalists continues with impunity
A Statement by the Asian Human Rights Commission   November 29, 2014  
Disappearances and extra judicial killings in the Sindh Province continues
unabated; in many cases disappearances have occurred following arrest
by the police and at times by plain clothed persons, presumably from
intelligence agencies; thereafter being taken into custody, most often
tortured and ultimately their bodies are found dumped on the streets.

In the Sindh Province, the security forces have made secular and
nationalist forces and activists their main target, in order to keep
them in illegal detention centres, torture them and thereafter are
extra judicially executed in an effort to eliminate any evidence of
the disappearances. During the year 2014, more than 100 activists from
nationalist groups particularly from the group ‘Jeay Sindh Muttahida
Mahaz’ (JSMM), a banned organisation, have been arrested and are
missing. On the other hand all the banned Muslim militant groups have
made the Sindh Province their safe haven and hiding place. Accusations
are levelled by the nationalist groups that security forces are
targeting nationalist forces to provide a space for religious militant
groups and the Taliban, similar to what took place in the Baluchistan
Province - where today as a result, the sectarian and militant groups
are operating freely and every year they are involved in killing more
than 1,000 persons in such sectarian violence.
In Sindh, the Jeay Sindh Muttahida Mahaz (JSMM) is the worst victim of
the intelligence agencies in this regard. Although the members of the
Jeay Sindh Qaumi Mahaz (JSQM), one of the major Sindhi nationalist
parties, Jeay Sindh Tehrik (JST) and other parties have been facing no
different situation, it’s worse for JSMM because they, unlike the
other parties, openly support an armed movement for the freedom of
Sindh.

On 15th August 2014, Mr. Asif Panhwar was arrested in a police raid at
his friend’s house in Nasim Nagar, Hyderabad, in the Sindh Province
and since then he has been missing. After 100 days of his
disappearance his bullet riddled and torture marked body was found on
the 25th of November this year. Asif Panhwar was a local leader of a
banned secular nationalist organisation, the ‘Jeay Sindh Muttahida
Mahaz’ (JSMM). Following his arrest and disappearance his brother
filed a petition in the Sindh High Court for his recovery. As is the
usual practice, the Sindh High Court did nothing, despite the appeals
by his brother that Asif Panhwar might be killed in detention by the
security agencies.
In another such incident on 15th October 2014, Paryal Shah, an
activist of the JSMM was abducted by the Pakistan security agencies
and since then he has been missing. His mutilated body was later found
on 7th November 2014 with clearly visible marks of torture. His body
was dumped near the city of Rahim Yar Khan in the Punjab Province
where military is operating torture cells in their Cantonment area.
Shah hosted the Baloch long march last year for the recovery of Baloch
missing persons. Victim’s brother, Zamin Shah was also killed by the
armed forces in fake encounter.
The bullet ridden body of Mr. Abdul Waheed Lashari, 37 years old, was
found after his disappearance after 15 days after being arrested in
the first week of November 2014 while he was travelling in a passenger
bus. Mr. Lashari was affiliated with the Jeay Sindh Qaumi Mahaz (JSQM)
Arisar group.
On 25th November 2014, a third-year student of Mehran University of
Engineering and Technology, in the Sindh Province went missing from
the Sindh University Housing Society, Jamshoro. Mr. Kamlesh Kumar was
standing at a photocopy shop when two police mobile vans and a car
approached them and dragged him in a police van. His only alleged
crime was that he belongs to the Hindu community and he was
participating in the protests against the persecution of religious
minority groups. He was not affiliated with any political group. The
family searched for Kamlesh at the police stations in Jamshoro and
Hyderabad and to no avail.
Many such activists who stand up against the kidnapping of Hindu
victims often go missing in the Sindh Province. The Chairman of Sindh
Human Rights Organization (SHRO), Fayaz Shaikh was abducted from the
city of Karachi. He has been organizing demonstrations on behalf of
several Hindu girls who have been kidnapped in Pakistan. He has been
abducted by unknown persons on 24th November 2014. His disappearance
came on the eve of yet another demonstration he was supposed to
organize under the auspices of the Sindh Human Rights Organization on
behalf of the nine Hindu girls kidnapped by the Islamic seminaries in
the Sindh Province. This is ironic since he was a leading voice who
began a campaign to approach the United Nations Secretary General, Ban
Ki-Moon, to take notice of the enforced disappearances of young Sindh
activists and to call for an end to all such kidnappings and
abductions of minorities and human rights activists there.
Another activist Mr. Rohel Laghari, 22 years old also belonging to the
JSMM was abducted on the 1st April 2014 from Hyderabad and his
whereabouts too are to date unknown.
Mr. Sarvech Pirzado who was yet another activist belonging to the
group JSMM and an employee of a private medical company was abducted
from the impress market in Karachi on 12th September 2014 by plain
clothed persons and was later hurled into a four wheel type jeep. His
family has filed a petition before the Sindh High Court for his
recovery but as in all the other instances, to date no decision has
been taken by the Court.
On October 11, the bullet riddled body of an activist of JSMM, Mr.
Shakeel Konhari, was found dumped near the Malir Military Cantonment,
Karachi. He was arrested from his house by the unknown persons.

The Asian Human Rights Commission urges the Government of Pakistan to
stop the persecution of the Sindhi nationalists and halt once and for
all these illegal and unconstitutional methods of enforced
disappearances and extra judicial killings in Pakistan. If the law
enforcement agencies have the evidences against the suspects and if
there are criminal charges against them the government must bring them
before the civil courts of law and tried.

The AHRC also urges the government to immediately ratify the
International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from
Enforced Disappearance and implement its provisions in law, policy and
practice, and in particular include a new and separate crime of
enforced disappearances in the penal code, as the government has
already pledged before the United Nations visiting team, the working
group of enforced and involuntary disappearances in 2012.

# # #
About AHRC:The Asian Human Rights Commission is a regional
non-governmental organisation that monitors human rights in Asia,
documents violations and advocates for justice and institutional
reform to ensure the protection and promotion of these rights. The
Hong Kong-based group was founded in 1984.

Read this Statement online
Asian Human Rights Commission
Asian Legal Resource Centre
Unit 1 & 2, floor 12,
Hopeful Factory Centre
10-16 Wo Shing Street, FOTAN,
New Territories. HONG KONG