Taliban and mind - set of Pakistani establishment, Interview with Arif Jamal on
slain General Sanaullah
Arif Jamal is the author of the forthcoming book
“Call for Transnational Jihad: Lashkar-e-Taiba 1985-2013.” He is an
author and journalist and a leading South Asia expert. He has been
international faculty and a leading South Asia expert at the Harvard University
and New York University. He has been a fellow at distinguished institutions including
the World Press Institute, Macalster College, Minnesota, USA, and the
University-College of London, UK.
In the last 15 years, Arif Jamal has written more
than 350 investigative and interpretive articles, focusing on such subjects as
Islamist politics in South Asia, jihad in Kashmir, Pakistan Army, madrassas and
Afghanistan. Arif Jamal has authored and co-authored many books and studies.
His book and studies include well-noted “SHADOW WAR: The Untold Story of Jihad
in Kashmir.” Several years ago he nicknamed Imran Khan as Taliban Khan which
instantly became popular.
Interview transcript:
Q. Your quote, on the recent murder of Major
General Sanaullah of the Pakstan Army by the Deobandi Taliban, has gone viral
on social media. Can we quote it here? Would you like to add to it?
Ans: Yes you can quote it in the intro, may be.
The following is taken from Arif Jamal’s Facebook
Status of September 16th:
When you raise vipers in your backyard, they are
bound to bite you. I remember this army officer giving me lectures on how great
the Taliban are, and how he “ADVISED” me to stop criticizing those who do great
service to Pakistan. I wish he can come back to life for an hour and give
me the same lecture and advice. What a service the friends of Pakistan are
doing to the country. Even his killing at the hands of the friends of Pakistan
will not change the mindset that is bound to take Pakistan and some other
countries to the stone age. I referring to a conversation that took place
between us some 10 year ago. He was a colonel at that time. He is not the first
general to have died at the hand of Muslim extremists. There was one Lt Gen as
well. If an attack on the Naval base, on the GHQ, on Kamra air base etc etc etc
etc could not change the mindset, an attack on a junior general won’t help. I
am sorry you are wrong if you think so. I hope I am proved wrong…
In closing Arif Jamal states:
“CLOSE THE JIHAD FACTORY AND STOP PRODUCING AND
HARBORING JIHADIS AND CRIMINALS” This is all Pakistan needs. Pakistan does not
need pompous 900-page counter terrorism strategy written by authors such as me.
I still pray I am proved wrong.
Q. Some generals, serving and retired, are said to
share the Taliban mindset. Others like General Alvi, a Shia general of a
liberal bent was allegedly murdered by Ilyas Kashmiri, a former army commando.
Would you care to elaborate?
Ans: Almost all Pakistani military officers are
either nationalist jihadists or Islamist jihadists. The nationalist jihadists
believe in using jihad as an instrument of defense policy to achieve
nationalistic goals such as the liberation of Kashmir and having strategic
depth in Afghanistan. The nationalist jihadists are quite modern and secular in
their daily lives. General Pervaiz Musharraf and General Ashfaq Pervez Kayani
are good examples of nationalist jihadists. General Musharraf was the first
Pakistani leader who publicly supported jihad and General Kayani revived the
policy of using jihad as an instrument of state policy soon after he took over
the command of the Pakistan army in 2007. Islamist jihadists are those who
believe in using jihad as an instrument of defense policy to achieve Islamist
objectives such as establishing an Islamic state in Kashmir, Afghanistan,
Pakistan and beyond. Good examples of Islamist jihadist in the military are Lt.
General Hamid Gul, Lt. Javed Nasir, General Mahmood Ahmed, etc. We do not see
many Islamist jihadist officers at the top, but a large number of them have
embraced this ideology among the military officers. There may be a few
individual exceptions who disagree with this. But, I don’t think Shia soldiers
or military officers have any problem with this policy.
Q- How has this come to this point?
This is the result of Pakistani military’s
obsession with using jihad as an instrument of its defense and foreign policies
since 1947, first against India and, later, against the former Soviet Union in
Afghanistan. However, we see that more and more soldiers and military officers
started converting from nationalist jihadists to Islamist jihadists after
Pakistan army surrendered to India in 1971. The process became accelerated
during and after the Afghan jihad. Unfortunately, this has been happening at an
unprecedented speed since the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
Q. You wrote a detailed and well researched
book, “Shadow War” on how the Pakistan Army trained the Deobandi and
Wahhabi-Salafist Jihadis that were used as proxies in Kashmir. Please tell us
more about it so that our readers can refer to your book?
Ans: The “Shadow War” is a detailed account of how
Pakistani military used jihad as an instrument of its defense policy in Kashmir
since 1947. I also show that General Ziaul Haq joined the Afghan jihad just to
prepare a far bigger jihad in Kashmir. During this time the military and jihadi
groups trained half a million jihadists to wage jihad in Kashmir and
Afghanistan. The jihadists Pakistani military trained for Kashmir have come to
haunt itself. Before 9/11, Ilyas Kashmiri was fighting jihad in Kashmir. His boys
used to behead Indian soldiers and put their severed heads in Pakistan.
Pakistani newspapers published the event on their front pages. He was
Pakistan’s hero. Today he and his boys are severing the heads of Pakistani
soldiers. It was the Lashkar-e-Taiba which founded the tradition of severing
the heads Indian soldiers. In 1995, LeT commander Haibat Khan brought the
severed head of an Indian soldier and it was put on display at the annual
congregation of the Jamatud Dawah in Murideke. Mujallah Al-Dawa published the
story in its December 1995 issue. Ilyas Kashmiri has spun out of the military
control but the LeT/JuD has yet to spin out of their control. This is bound to
happen, sooner or later. The day LeT spins out of their control, it would be
the end of Pakistan as we know it…
Q: So that is the theme of your next forthcoming
book?
Ans: Yes and more. My forthcoming book is a
detailed history and profile of the LeT. It is an academic study which shows
how big and global the monster has become and how dangerous it would be when it
spins out of the ISI control. Unlike most Deobandi jihadi groups, the LeT is a
truly global organization, with jihadi infrastructure and members in dozens of
countries from Japan to the US. Al-Qaida was never a match for the LeT. The book
covers both the ambitions and the growing capabilities of the LeT in the global
context.
Q-Will the book create controversies?
Ans-I have used mostly primary sources. For
example, the Jamatud Dawa considers elections and democracy ‘kufr.’ Hafiz Saeed
does not believe in Pakistan’s constitution. He believes Pakistan’s
constitution is ‘batil’ which is a very harsh word.
I have cited his speeches and writings on this in the Mujallah Al-Dawa and
other JuD publications. He cannot deny that. It is unfortunate that nobody in
Pakistan talks about the real discourse of the JuD because it is patronized by
the Pakistani military. The JuD discourse and narrative is far more dangerous
than al-Qaida and any Deobandi jihadist group. It is freely available in the
JuD offices.
Q-You recently told BBC that the LeT has nearly
half a million members. Are not you exaggerating?
Ans. No. I may be understating. According to a
recent interview of Hafiz Saeed, some 49,000 students are enrolled in the
al-Dawa schools which number more than 200. I presume as many if not more have
graduated from these schools since 1993/94 when the first school was founded in
Lahore. I have used such primary sources to calculate the number. The reality
is that the JuD mouthpiece al-Dawa a few years ago claimed 2 million members. I
present the documentary evidence such as this in the book. My estimate is only
one quarter of the official claims.
Q. The line often taken in Pakistan by certain pro
establishment journalists is that the army wants to take action against the
Taliban but is not supported by the politicians. ANP and PPP are often blamed
as well as PTI. Curiously, PML N is treated with kid gloves on this issue (it
has been rebranded as “anti establishment). Is the army really following the elected
politicians and that PML N.
Ans: Unfortunately, most politicians have
surrendered to the military on the question of fighting against the Islamist
radicals. The PPP tried to assert in the beginning but withdrew in the
background within a few months after coming into power. Unfortunately, some of
the PPP leaders have even tried to act as Taliban apologists. Unfortunately,
the ANP also followed suit. The MQM was the only political party during the
2008-2013 period which kept opposing the Islamist radicals. The Sharif
government has surrendered to the military and the Islamist radicals without
even trying to fight. It is simply doing what the military tells them. Imran
Khan is trying to create a space for the Taliban and Talibanization. He wrongly
believes that they would let him rule the country as a reward. I think
Pakistani society has become too radical. They voted for those who were soft on
Islamist radicalism. Pakistani military does not trust the PPP, ANP and MQM.
They like those who put up less resistance. It is quite clear that the
Pakistani military is not ready to fight the jihadists they have created even
if they have spun out of their control. But they want the politicians to take
the blame. Sharif and Imran Khan doing the same.
Q. Pakistani media and intelligentsia often present
the Taliban as a diverse collection of groups. In 2011, the Jinnah Institute
published a Foreign Policy Elite report where the majority of those interviewed
proposed that Mullah Omar’s Quetta Shura and Haqqani Network should be
accommodated in the post-NATO Afghanistan in 2014. Are we seeing the
fulfillment of this report unfolding before us?
Ans- Well.. that was what the Pakistani military
desired. The report carried the views of those who reflect military’s
worldview. I am not sure if that would happen. In the last 66 years, the jihad
in Kashmir and jihad in Afghanistan have backfired. Pakistan is paying the
price for waging jihad in the neighboring countries. We have repeatedly seen
that jihadists frequently spin out of control. In addition to destroying the
country, Pakistani military is undoing itself by following this policy. The
latest evidence came in the form of Major General Sanauullah. Pakistani
soldiers and generals will keep dying at the hands of the jihadists they
create. I think the jihadists will be able to kill Pakistani military officers
and generals many times more in the coming years. I hope I am proved wrong. But
that is hoping against hope.
No comments:
Post a Comment