Monday, 5 January 2026

Naked Aggression Disguised as Democracy: Venezuela, Trump, and the Moral Collapse of American Imperial Claims Dr Shabir Choudhry 05 January 2026

 Naked Aggression Disguised as Democracy: Venezuela, Trump, and the Moral Collapse of American Imperial Claims

Dr Shabir Choudhry 05 January 2026


The recent U.S. intervention in Venezuela under President Donald Trump marks a decisive moment in the erosion of the moral, legal, and ethical foundations upon which American foreign policy once claimed legitimacy. Stripped of euphemisms and public-relations narratives, what unfolded was not democracy promotion, humanitarian concern, or the defence of human rights—it was naked aggression, imperial coercion, and resource-driven domination.


When President Trump publicly declared that the United States would now “run Venezuela,” he dispensed with even the pretence of international law. This was not regime change by persuasion, nor multilateral intervention, nor an UN-mandated action. It was conquest rhetoric—unvarnished and unapologetic.


Aggression Without Justification

Under international law, particularly the UN Charter, the use of force against a sovereign state is prohibited except in self-defence or with Security Council authorisation. Venezuela posed no military threat to the United States. No American city was endangered, no treaty invoked, no imminent danger demonstrated.


Yet Venezuela was invaded.


This alone places Trump’s action squarely within the definition of illegal aggression, the same crime for which leaders were prosecuted at Nuremberg. The difference today is not legality, but power.


The Myth of a “Clean Operation”

The narrative presented by Trump—a swift, precise operation with minimal casualties—serves a political function: to sanitise imperial violence. The carefully curated account of special forces heroics and air dominance is designed to obscure a far more damning reality: the operation succeeded not because of military brilliance alone, but because of coercion, intimidation, and elite-level bargaining.


The Venezuelan military did not fight, not because the invasion was legitimate, but because resistance would have meant national annihilation.

This is not consent.

This is extortion under threat of overwhelming force.

When a country with 150 aircraft overhead is told: surrender or be destroyed, the absence of resistance does not imply legitimacy—it confirms coercion.


Regime Change by Transaction

The likely negotiated removal of President Maduro in exchange for guarantees to military and intelligence elites exposes the true nature of the operation. This was not liberation of the Venezuelan people; it was a managed transition that preserved the existing power structure, minus an inconvenient leader.


Imperialism has evolved. It no longer requires colonial governors. It requires:

  • Controlled elites
  • Preserved institutions
  • Guaranteed access to resources

The revolution was sacrificed, but the state apparatus survived—now aligned with Washington’s interests.


Imperial Logic: Resources Over Rights

Venezuela possesses:

  • The world’s largest proven oil reserves
  • Strategic Caribbean access
  • Long-standing ties with China and Russia


That combination made it intolerable to U.S. strategic planners.

This was not about Maduro’s authoritarianism. If it were, Washington would not arm, fund, and protect dozens of regimes with far worse human-rights records. This was about who controls oil, trade routes, and strategic alignment in America’s “backyard.”

Imperialism has always followed resources. Trump merely said the quiet part aloud.


The Collapse of Moral Authority

How can a state that:

  • Invades sovereign countries without legal justification
  • Topples governments through force and coercion
  • Seizes assets and dictates political outcomes

claim the moral authority to lecture others on democracy and human rights?

Democracy imposed at gunpoint is not democracy.

Human rights enforced through collective punishment and sanctions are not human rights.

When Washington decides which elections count, which governments are legitimate, and which leaders must disappear, it ceases to be a promoter of democracy and becomes an imperial adjudicator of sovereignty.


Why Russia and China Could Not Stop It

The Venezuelan case exposes an uncomfortable truth of the current global order: alliances with Russia or China offer resilience, not salvation. They provide diplomatic cover, economic breathing space, and deterrence—but they do not guarantee protection against direct U.S. military intervention.


When faced with annihilation, the Venezuelan high command chose survival over martyrdom. This was not betrayal; it was realism.

Imperial power works precisely because it forces impossible choices.


A Precedent With Global Consequences

If Venezuela can be invaded, subdued, and reordered without consequence, then sovereignty itself becomes conditional. The message to the Global South is unmistakable:

  • Resources make you a target
  • Defiance invites coercion
  • International law applies only to the weak

This is not a rules-based order. It is a hierarchy enforced by force.


Conclusion: Empire Without Shame

What Trump did in Venezuela was not an aberration—it was imperialism without disguise. No humanitarian fig leaf. No liberal rhetoric. Just power asserting itself over weakness.

Empires fall not only because they overreach, but because they lose credibility. When a state that practises coercion, looting, and domination claims to defend democracy, it invites global cynicism—and eventual resistance.


Venezuela is not just a tragedy for Latin America. It is a warning to all resource-rich, strategically located states: in a world governed by power rather than principle, sovereignty survives only where strength, unity, and strategic clarity exist.

Those who still believe lectures on democracy come from moral conviction rather than material interest have not been paying attention.


Dr Shabir Choudhry is a London-based political analyst, author, and expert on South Asian affairs, with a focus on Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Kashmir.

Email: drshabirchoudhry@gmail.com

 

No comments: